Could you please explain why you removed "landuse = forest" from those objects? E.g. from this one way/156717121 - why shouldn't this be a forest?

revertiert mit changeset/34914005

... and the DWG is aware too

... I've wrote a notification mail.

umm, there are much more similar changesets by LeTopographeFou. Where is the discussion for those changes?

See changeset/34479372

See changeset/34479372

See changeset/34479372

Hi LeTopographeFou, could you please comment on the relation of your changeset with osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?

Hi kjon, how is your changeset different from changeset/27540041 which has been reverted?

Ich habe den User per Mail angeschrieben und Hilfe angeboten.

reverted - apparently a test.

self-reverted by changeset/30763008

reverted by changeset/30761163 after not-satisfying explanation by mail by jengelh. Mailed the original mapper's new account.

apparently nowhere. Please see (and discuss at) the some hours older discussion on changeset/30746525 which had the same action

Beispielsweise bei node/1818978043 oder node/971984096 wäre es ein Leichtes gewesen, die voltage anzugeben … Übrigens: die Edits gehen gerade so weiter ... changeset/30749206 Ich habe nun auch mal angemailt

mit changeset/30733817 revertiert, da leider keine Antwort auf meine Mail und das recht offensichtlich Tests/Fehler sind (Wege ohne Tags, neue Flächen ohne Bedeutung erstellt, einen Autohändler, der direkt am Ufer sitzen soll (obwohl in bing deutlich an der alten Position)!? Stadteilgrenze gelöscht).

Notiz: habe tina777arc wegen wohl versehentlicher Löschung angemailt

reverted by changeset/30669499

Hmm, well, I have reverted this whole changeset now to have no further complication. The only more or less possibly useful changes in Australia were the bus station and the information centre. If that was intentional, please redo those edits, but please draw the buildings smaller or only draw the amenity area. Your buildings were obviously much too big. And please set a new changeset comment before you hit save - you had reused your first changeset comment from a HOT task.