Thanks for fix. I am an occassional mapper. While trying to fix unconnected coast line errors introduced by my edits, I seem to have disturbed few other ways. I will be careful next time and subject my coastline related edits to review.

@hb, Sorry It is me who created it, not Adivik2000, Sorry Adivik2000.

Sorry, I missed the title for the comment. It was

You put this place into the arctic sea: node/6632730143 ...

@hb, Thanks for the clarification. I post the comment and fix
comment
by swapping LON and Lat. On the other hand, Nodes 5565204453 and 5458482097 already exist for those two villages So you might delete it anyway. TXs and cheers Michael

Response

Thanks for bringing it to my attention. It was uploaded by Adivik2000 As this is a different village, I have fixed the lat long.

Thank you.

Ambajipeta (10141258, v1) does not agree with http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/maps/atlas/28part31.pdf (page 348) There is no enclave. Similarly Amalapuram (10141257, v1) also needs to be corrected (page 354 of the census map above) as there is no exclave in it.

As mentioned in the changeset comment, population and population:date were added from wikidata based on the wikidata mappings done earlier. Most of the places did not have actual population data earlier. This will help in the rendering engines rendering based on the actual population data.

This was reverted as the cadastral based boundaries were not considered legal as per as per https://apsac.ap.gov.in/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/6fc8a37e-7e66-41c4-9260-da1eec193f04

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/76746673 where the changeset comment is:

Thanks for the correction. Can you share the source for the correction, as you rightly said that Bharatmaps did not contain this.

Hi, Chinaganjam mandal relation/10164496 also has an enclave as per Bharat maps, which is not mapped.

Hope, I am not troubling you lot with my discussion points.

The following errors are thrown up about Zarugumalli when I attempted to add wikidata today.

Intersection between multipolygon ways (4)
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@2f468966, code=1606, message=Intersection between multipolygon ways]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@2f468966, code=1606, message=Intersection between multipolygon ways]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@2f468966, code=1606, message=Intersection between multipolygon ways]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@2f468966, code=1606, message=Intersection between multipolygon ways]
Unconnected coastline (2)
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.Coastlines@9901372f, code=903, message=Unconnected coastline]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.Coastlines@9901372f, code=903, message=Unconnected coastline]

I think Zarugumalli has two exclaves as I saw from the census document map and you seem to have mapped one only.

Let me know your feedback.

Nice work.

Glad to see you improving OSM. If you can add address details from their website it would become even better.

Cleaned up some inadvertent edits. Keep up your good work

Thanks for your contribution. I made a minor update to the name and address

There are two NH167A relations. I think one could be deleted.

Welcome. Landuse need not be contained in administrative boundaries. for example for way/738364011#map=18/10.94956/76.09477 could spread even to neighboring administrative areas.

Welcome to OSM. Hope you find osm.wiki helpful for you.

Thanks. As you have been editing several Andhra Pradesh districts, do you see any major errors with Prakasam district (which shares borders with Guntur, Nellore, Kurnool districts) boundary, as it was formed in 1970's. Your answer will help me to know the extent of errors in AP district shapes and might be helpful in taking up corrections.