I see, I should have been more clear. The nodes I linked in my message above show the Central Beaverton and Denny Whitford/Raleigh West boundary crossing straight through the Kuni BMW and overlapping itself, which is what I thought was unintentional. I would fix it but I'm not sure where the updated boundaries should be.

Hi ,
Thank you for fixing this. However, I noticed you unintentionally dragged nodes on the Central Beaverton and Denny Whitford/Raleigh West boundary in this changeset. See:
node/8783908261
node/454364311

Error in changeset comment, downgraded Moxee to village, not city

Hi ScottProck,
It seems that it just took awhile for the name of the area to show up as I can see it now. Because of this, I removed the node you've added in this changeset.

-archpdx

Hi d1g1talm3rc,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed in this changeset that you changed the building type for 1928 to a house. In this case, the building type was already correct as Detatched House is considered a more specific term for single family homes while House is more of a generic term. See more here:
building=*

Based on the imagery, this house is indeed a single family home. If you need any help, feel free to respond to this comment.

-archpdx

Hi again,
I have converted the lots you've created into plots and address points like I explained above in changeset/105507693: changeset/105507693

Hi biasedhedgehog,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I appreciate the contributions you've made to the map so far. I noticed you added lots as houses. In OSM, houses are meant to outline the actual house building. OSM doesn't recommend adding lot areas, but if you really want to you can change these to plots. See this wiki page for more info:
place=plot

It is more common though to see address points for scenarios like these when buildings themselves don't yet appear in the imagery. If you need any help with this feel free to respond to my comment. Again, thank you for your contributions and happy mapping!

-archpdx

Hi again,
Thanks for replying. I understand how you're not familiar with this area. It is particularly difficult to distinguish townhouses and apartment buildings in this area from just the imagery. I do think, however, it's best if you tag buildings appropriately if you can obviously see what their purpose is.

Please disregard my comment, I see that you already know about building types based on other changesets.

Hi alex-galaxy,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I appreciate your contributions to the map so far. I just wanted to let you know in the future, you could add houses with building=house, or just house on the editor you're using, row houses, apartment buildings, etc. This isn't absolutely necessary, but is good practice. You can read more about the different types of buildings you can add here:
building=*

If you need any help, feel free to respond to my comment. Again, thank you for your contributions and happy mapping!

-archpdx

Thanks for updating the park boundaries and clarifying that that parcel is most likely privately owned. The path going through it threw me off a little and I was looking at 'bills' when I should've looked at 'payment history'.

>>More descriptive changeset comments help other mappers get a general sense of which elements of the map you have edited and avoid confusion.

Should say 'to avoid any confusion'

Hi Danno722,
Please remember to use more descriptive changeset comments than "jifow" in the future. I see you've been contributing to OSM for awhile and the majority of your changeset comments in the past year have been similar to this one.
More descriptive changeset comments help other mappers get a general sense of which elements of the map you have edited and avoid confusion. See this wiki page for more info:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Best regards,
archpdx

Hi Saif alhattali,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! It seems that you've mistakenly modified a parking lot in the United States, hence the large bounding box for this changeset. Based on the imagery for that area, a parking lot doesn't exist there. Please be more careful in the future when editing the map as other mappers might view edits like these as suspicious.

Also, it's good practice to have more descriptive changeset comments than just "S". See this wiki page for more information:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

-archpdx

Hi iana24,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your work in trying to make OSM more accurate. I noticed that you added a note about the maximum length for this bridge and the adjacent roadway. I've added maxlength 'tags' on top of the notes you've added, and it will be of best practice to use these in the future. This is because notes are usually used for other editors, and not viewers of the map. When you select a roadway, you will be able to see the 'tags' by scrolling all the way to the bottom.

Additional information can be found on the wiki here:
maxlength=*

Feel free to respond to my comment if you need any help with this. Happy mapping!

Best regards,
archpdx

Error in changeset comment, meant to write 'north' of OR-569, not south

Hi davmoochi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I appreciate your work in helping make OSM more accurate. I recommend adding a 'point' for the foundation you added on top of the appropriate building instead of renaming the entire building as there seems to be other organizations in this building, such as Transitional Youth and Luis Palau Evangelistic Association. If these points are outdated and these organizations no longer reside in this building, you can just delete these points by selecting them and pressing ctrl+backspace. Feel free to reply to my comment if you need any help with this. Happy mapping!

Best regards,
archpdx

Hi tguen,
Thank you for informing me of this and fixing it. I'll make sure to check if I made errors like these in other areas, sorry about that.

Also, thank you for resolving some of the notes I've opened up recently!

-archpdx

Spelling error in changeset comment, should say 'Mapped Gabbert Butte Nature Park'

I meant construction, not opening of this segment of Cornelius Pass