This changeset has been reverted in changeset/129924555

Hi,
Please note for (way/1120521571) that the architect tag is used for the architect (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architect) of the building.

Also, most tags you added as 'no' for (way/1120510595) are already implied, so there's no need to explicitly add these. For example, bicycle, foot, horse, and motor_vehicle tags are already implied by the access tag.

Hi,

Please note that you've added road related tags to TCTD Route 2 bus route (relation/2149185). Please note that in OSM, we map roads and bus routes separately.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for contributing your knowledge of the area. Please note, however, that we're not allowed to use Google Maps, Bing Maps, or other commercial maps as sources because of copyright (see osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?)

Also, multipolygons are only meant for either complex areas with holes inside, or a feature consisting of multiple disjoint areas (see osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon). Some of the multipolygons you added in this changeset don't meet this criteria (ie relation/14986170). In this case, I would remove this relation and instead add a 'Pharmacy' point.

It's also important to know that the name tag should not be used to describe features in OSM (see osm.wiki/Names##Names_are_not_for_descriptions). For cases like (relation/10408703) I would leave out the name as the tags (natural=wetland + wetland=saltmarsh) already indicate that this is a Salt Marsh, while in cases like (way/1047327684) I would move this to the 'Description' tag.

Another guideline we have in OSM is to not abbreviate road names (see osm.wiki/abbreviation). For example, in (way/117805232), 'Hwy' should be unabbreviated to 'Highway'.

In the future, please use more meaningful changeset comments: 'Living in town pays off' does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. You can read more about what makes a good changeset comment here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thank you for taking the time to read through this. If you have any questions or need any help with the things I mentioned here, feel free to reply to this comment.

-archpdx

Hi,
Please note that we don't use the name tag to describe features in OSM (see osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). For golf holes, the name tag should only be used for designated names (ie 'Tea Olive). You can read more about this here:
golf=hole

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please note that the park feature type should only be used for parks. There should be a separate feature type for grass.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please note that we don't use the name tag to describe features in OSM (see osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). For example, the retail area you mapped here with the name 'Bank' (way/1120226545) should have its name removed.

Also, please note that only parks should be mapped as a park (not just any publicly accessible/green space, see leisure=park). Please either remove the two parks you added or use more appropriate tags for these features. If you're unsure what tags to use, consider asking the forum (https://community.osm.org/c/71).

In the future, please use more meaningful changeset comments: "Assignment 2" does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. You can read more about what makes a good changeset comment here (osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments)

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. In the future, please use more meaningful changeset comments: “#amap” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding these addresses. Please note however that we don't use the name field for describing features in OSM (see osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). The information you added in the address field should suffice.

Also, it looks like you've added that address for 2008 to both the building and as a separate point. I would either remove the point or remove the address data from the building.

It looks like they removed it again in way/1119452780

(you can read more about why we don't abbreviate street names here: osm.wiki/abbreviation)

Hi,
Thanks for adding these street names! Please note however that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM. For example, 'Margaux Ct' should be unabbreviated to 'Margaux Court'

Hi, thanks for adding these street names! Please note however that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM (you can read more about why here: osm.wiki/abbreviation)

For example, "Blvd" should be unabbreviated to "Boulevard" and "Northwest" instead of "NW"

Thanks for these changes!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129623045

Hi,
Please note that edits made on MAPS.ME are uploaded to OpenStreetMap and can be seen by everyone. Please refrain from adding personal notes to the map.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for correcting this street name. Please note however, that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM, you can read more about it here: osm.wiki/abbreviation

Same thing as changeset/129449703, 'Bull Springs Rd' should be unabbreviated to 'Bull Springs Road'

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please note that we don't abbreviate road names in OSM. For example, 'Brooks Scanlon Rd' should be unabbreviated to 'Brooks Scanlon Road'

Hi,

It looks like this changeset and adds nodes without any tags such as node/9593390002

I also noticed that this changeset adds building=yes to all address. Some of these addresses, however, don't have any buildings (ie node/9593389981) or already have their own building area (ie node/9593389825). Ideally, the building tags from these addresses should be removed and/or merged with their respective building.