Varför har du ändrat vägsträckning med underlag av Bing? Bing är kända för att ha en viss offset. Vägarna - inte bara de här som du ändrat sträckningen på utan även andra - har tidigare ritats efter mycket exakta satelitfoton (LMs ortofoto). Så vad du har gjort genom alla dessa ändringar är att vägarna nu har en felaktig sträckning. Jag kan bara ge dig rådet att göra en revert på alla dina edits där du har "korrigerat" väglinjen.

Du har närmast massändrat helt rätt taggade (av flera användare) cykel- och gångvägar från path till cycleway. Vänligen sluta med detta. Jag har återställt alla dessa ändringar. Hur kan du få för dig att taggningen var fel? Om du gör såna omtaggningar en gång till så anmäler jag dig för vandalism.

Lycka till! Fråga bara om du undrar något. Sedan kan du få bra hjälp i owm-wikin: osm.wiki/Sv:Beginners%27_guide

Hej, så som du har taggad det är det en vanlig gata. Du menade nog highway=path. Kolla här så ser du vilka alternativ det finns: highway=*#Values

Why did you delete "brand:wikipedia=*" and "brand:wikidata=*" in this cs?

Yes I agree with you the geographical references are quite descripive and good but they are not names but references to some geographical surroundings. Modern enterpises don't spend time on giving names to things, they know there are coordinates and geodatabases and ref-numbers.

Then it's really about wheather to adhere to the osm-tagging schema or to make tagging for developer's of apps. Personally I like the osm-way better. "leave name=blank", well when there is no name you have either the choice of leaving name blank or to invent a phonyname/pseudoname.

In order to achive this the osm-tagging schema should be droppet and made Googlemaps like?

Habe es gefixt. Keine Validieringsfehler auf jeden Fall. Mach's gut!

"Tesla Supercharger" tagged as name? That's the contrary to what I said. Tesla Supercharger is a brandname (look it up at wikidata, you will see). Osm has a special tag for this "brand".

"name field need to be more descriptive." As I explained in the example above the osm-way of tagging is far more descriptive. The information I get from the osm-tagging tells me more about this object than the Googlemap-tagging in name-field "Servicehus". So the on the on the ground rule is silly and should not get into conflict with the norwegian namegiving authority? Is this what you are saying?

Because osm-tagging differs from GoogleMap-tagging. The other day I had contact w a new mapper who was mapping a camp site. I explained to him/her why tagging a building w name-tag-value "Serivcehus" is more paper-maps or GoogleMaps tagging and that the osm-way of tagging was by tagging building=service + amenity=toilets etc. It is because of this that osm-tagging is far better. It tells you more about things than just having this in the name-tag like in Google och papermaps.

Ich habe inzwischen nachgesehen. Du hast die Grense des Waldpolygons aussendrum herum gezogen. Ich glaube, das war das einzigste. Willst du versuchen oder soll ich es machen?

se again: changeset/117461674

As I wrote, in contrast to you, I have been at this place. I can verify lots of parking spaces and some electrical outlets.
You did a revert regarding the addr-tags in the middle of this discussion. Why then and not now?

Hallo, durch einen deiner cs gestern, ich habe nicht kontrolliert ob es gerade dieser hier ist, hast du das Multipolygon des Waldstuecks beschädigt. Du siehst dies vermutlich selbst da die gruene Farbe des Waldes nicht mehr auf der Karte zu sehen ist. Wuerdest du bitte so freundlich sein dies zu beheben? Danke im voraus!

@NKA please notice changeset/117461674

@NKA
After survey on ground I could not find any hints of the value for the name-tag you inserted in this changeset. I could not find any possible means of this charging station to recieve letters (no post box no person).
So why and on what grounds did you insert the name-tag and later on the addr-tags? Obviously you did not check the correctness on ground. With other words your changes could not be verified on ground. I would like to remind you of the basic principles for editing on osm (osm.wiki/How_We_Map). Especially the points about "trouthfullness" - that is not to invent anything and inserting into osm (ex names). But also the point of verifiablety.
The insertion of "Tesla" by you in the name-tag could furthermore be interpreted as brand placement.
What met me on place was parking spaces with a couple of electrical outputs designed for charging car-batteries. Nothing gandious.
As must be expected this lack of name and address most probably applies to the other charging stations which you altered in this changset (changeset/117361552). Or did you check this on ground? So I ask you hereby to revert this changeset. Thank you in advance.

laddstolpar - "store anleggene"? Vad snackar du om?

Stilisera inte det här som en principiell fråga. Det gäller det här - misslyckade - changeset. I wikin nämns INTE name som en "usefull combination". Sedan kan du lätt se dig omkring hur det handhas. Här lite statistik (för enkelhetens skull bara poi): DE tot: 16762 st med name-tagg: 3898 st, DK tot: 690 st med name-tagg: 85 st, UK tot 3045: med name-tagg: 738 st, SE tot: 696 st med name-tagg: 195 st och "the winner is" NO tot 2668: st med name-tagg: 2465. Var nu klok och släpp det här med name-taggen på laddstolpar. Som du ser av statistiken ovan så är det bara i NO som det råder norske tilstander.