danke :)

Dobrý deň, pár otázok:

1) Máte zdroj k zmenám Zubre → Zubra a Zúbria → Zúbra?
2) Prečo ste zmazali name:hu=Háromszlécs?
3) Prečo ste dali population=Slováci? Má to byť číslo, nie (slovenské) slovo.

Actually, some streets in Bratislava *do* have Hungarian names, but those a historic names. I’m not sure what’s the best way to map them.

I’m sorry if the tone came across as condescending, that’s wasn’t my intention. When you edit an object in MAPS.ME, it tells you what the type of the object is, which is a good way to double-check you’re editing the right one, since the user interface in MAPS.ME unfortunately makes it very easy to contribute an incorrect change.

Apparently unintentionally, but you contributed this change about 5 days ago using MAPS.ME. I have already reverted it, so with the next map update you should be able to see it correctly.

Besides, the Unión garden already existed:
way/27356583

Maria, you should really check what objects you’re editing. You’ve just renamed the entire city of Guanajuato to "union garden".
Please pay more attention in future.

Ozaj? :(

@aceman444, nestačilo už? toto som prediskutoval na #osm a všetci tam s tým súhlasili.

Zopakujem: v rozpore to nie je, ale už nejdem diskutovať o tom, prestáva ma to baviť.

Čo sa týka toho, kto čo preferuje, to sa mi ani nechce komentovať, je to strašne ignorantský prístup.

V Bratislave sa to používa skorej ako subjektivná bicyklabilnosť ≈ cesta je vhodná pre relatívne bezpečnú jazdu, a cyklisti túto cestu skutočne preferujú iným cestám. Čo ani neodporuje „ruskému“ významu, ani nie je duplicitné.

> Pouzivat na to bicycle:practical=yes mne vadit nebude, ale mozno tym Rusom, co tu znacku vymysleli, kedze vase pouzitie je v rozpore s jej popisom na wiki (prelozil som si to).

Zrejme ten preklad nebol správny, lebo v rozpore to nie je. Je to trochu inak používane ale stále vyznám tagu je rovnaký: bicyklabilnosť.

Myslím si že Michal s touto charakteristikou prehnal, ale upload duplicitných neoverených a nekorektných dát a vymazanie správnych nie je dobrý postup.

Hi @MartinNagyMN, this import has not been co-ordinated with the community, and is not done properly.

Could you please revert and join the discussion in osm_sk@googlegroups.com?

Thanks!

Hi @MartinNagyMN, this import has not been co-ordinated with the community, and is not done properly.

Could you please revert and join the discussion in osm_sk@googlegroups.com?

Thanks!

I could have made a mistake or looked at a different changeset, but I cannot find the ways I've seen.

Strange, I cannot see them anymore.

As far as I can see there are multiple ways which aren't part of any relations and don't have any tags.

Hi,

This changeset of yours seems to add a lot of nonsense data, such as ways with invalid tags or without tags at all.

Could you please verify and fix it?

Thanks!

Hi,

You seem to have added a lot of meaningless tags to way/507084935/history…

Please check the data you upload to make sure this doesn't happen in future :)

Thanks!

Could you please make sure you don't add meaningless tags such as yes=yes next time? :)

Thanks!