amosharper's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 171136184 | Thanks DaveF. I used the below wiki guidance to change them to halts - I'm happy with whichever, but could you help me understand why you think "station" is the better choice for these two tourist railway stops? osm.wiki/File:Station-or-halt.svg Thanks. |
|
| 171130179 | Whoops, my fault, good catch! |
|
| 170078952 | Thanks for the corrections! |
|
| 169049696 | I've manually reinstated the deleted caves in change changeset/169808310. I can't overstate how frustrating, despiriting, and exhausting it is to find that another mapper has deleted things you spent time implementing. |
|
| 169049696 | This change resulted in the deletion of the caves under White Rock. These caves took a long time and a lot of research to accurately map. Please be more careful about what you delete when changing the map. Thank you. |
|
| 169459358 | (Don't beat me up for invading your turf, Bexhill-OSM). |
|
| 169329502 | (and modified coffee room "cuisine" tags to correct mispelling and use more common values) |
|
| 169278439 | @JamesCPrentice you've accidentally marked the entirety of St Leonards-on-sea as a single house in this edit. This has raised a number of errors - please do check your edits carefully before submitting. I'll revert. Thanks. |
|
| 169007596 | Hello - I'm a bit confused about this edit. My existing buildings here were accurate to the shape of the building and the cadastral map. The newly drawn buildings are less accurate (you can compare with a less-frequently-updated tiling service like some of the layers on https://graphhopper.com/maps/) and do not line up with the cadastral map - it looks like the rooves have been traced rather than the bases of the buldings. Was there an error that caused my submission to need to be redrawn? |
|
| 167575210 | *Oops, 'The Cake Box' |
|
| 167449341 | (and fixed building levels that were marked underground) |
|
| 166267518 | Hello - thanks for your edit. I can see you've added businesses in several countries across Europe. In future, please try to limit your changesets to small geographical areas to avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers. Thanks! Guidance here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets |
|
| 166120743 | 💚 |
|
| 165703100 | I'm not sure what editor you're using, but I'd *really* encourage you to adopt three changes to your editing: 1. *Please* check your edits before submitting. The amount you're contributing is great and it's nice to see another local editor, but accuracy is really important. osm.wiki/Accuracy 2. Do try to align your building footprints to the base of the building. It's worth using the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer to align the satellite imagery.
3. Consider squaring your buildings' corners - this will bring curved edges into line and give near-right-angles proper right angles.
Thank you! |
|
| 165703100 | Hello - quick issue here, seven buildings on Princes Rd have been given the house number "1", and many of them are marked as being several lasyers below ground level. |
|
| 165671041 | Hello - thanks for your edit. I can see you've added businesses in Portugal, Belgium and Thailand. In future, please try to limit your changesets to small geographical areas to avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers. Thanks! Guidance here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets |
|
| 165518584 | Hello - it's hard to explain without visuals, but take 6 The Uplands as an example:
Two of the nodes in the perimeter way have addr:housenumber and addr:street properties:
I guess this is because you've copied and edited the way from another on Silchester Road. The address properties on the nodes should be removed, since you've already got address properties on the way as a whole. |
|
| 165482724 | Please don't use the "name" key for building descriptions such as way/1381525736 "Three rear flats - Residential" or 1381665071 "Rear flats". Thanks. |
|
| 165551164 | Hello! Please note that the "name" feature should be used only for the primary name of a building and not a description, such as "Block fo Flats" [sic] in way/1382013516 or "Antique Shop" in way/1382013510, both on the west half of Norman Road. Thanks. |
|
| 165542362 | Way number 1381957720 seems to have postcodes as addr:housenumber here. Could you please check? |