Hiya. How come you're using RapiD for these tasks? I think regular iD would be better. You don't need Facebook's computer vision import data.

By using RapiD you make it harder for the community to monitor the FB data additions, please don't use it if not needed

Careful withy RapiD data! It's data quality isn't great. You've got a track going through a building here.

Hallo. Warum benutz du RapiD? Falls man bracht keine Facebook/AI daten, denn normales iD ist besser.

Hi there. :) Are you sure about this? You have one of the tracks intersecting a water feature, and which is along side a conveyor belt. RapiD has problems with linear features. Are you sure this is right?

As a quick fix, I've undone it

changeset/79192891

Hallo, Du hast `source=digitalglobe` eingetragen ( way/760736230 ), aber das Quelle ist Maxar, oder? Ist `source=digitalglobe` rightig?

Hi, careful with RapiD. If you're adding things you can improve the road geom, like this road ( way/134741195 )

I notice you used RapiD here, but I don't think you actually used any of the Facebook provided computer vision data? If so, it would be better to use regular iD. We need to keep an eye on RapiD edits, so if you don't need to use it, it's better to not be flagged.

Careful about using RapiD! You've added some roads which go through hedges & the like here.

I've fixed it up here changeset/79188422

Jein. Normales iD ist besser als RapiD. RapiD hat viele daten-import-features, es ist nur für Facebook imports.

Hallo, Warum nutzt du RapiD? Warum nicht normales iD?

Careful about using RapiD!

Are you _sure_ you should be adding local, personal data like that? That doesn't sound like a real name for a house

Here you changed the name of the beach to "Restaurant Vera", and I don't think that's right for the whole beach. I've removed it here changeset/77639099

Hi there. Here you added `name=Field` to many fields. In OSM you don't need to add such names if they are just a description. Then `landuse=farmland` is enough. 😊 I removed some of them in this changeset ( changeset/77580556#map=15/-29.6429/27.2471 )

You're right, my mistake! 🙂

Hello. Here you added the `website` tag to the thign which already has a `contact:website` tag. It's not good to have two tags which duplicate the same data, so I removed it here ( changeset/77067370 )

You added `gay=yes` to a restaurant ( node/3190690061 ). How does that work? From their website they seem to be pretty regular. I thought ``gay=yes` was for gay bars & the like?

(BTW I'm slowly upgrading all to `lgbtq=primary` which is a better tag)

Is the wikidata tag still valid? The wikidata item ( https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q13129402 ) refers to a listed building. Should the building, not the pub, get the tag instead?

You added a wikidata tag to this pub ( node/244002338 )? That seems... strange, are you sure it's right?

Thanks for your feedback. I've added a fixme to the rough rivers I add like this, and sometimes go back and improve the geometry later ( e.g. changeset/75564471#map=12/-14.2093/20.2708 ). Adding 'rough' data is better than none IMO.

It's been 10+ years since I was last in Zambia.