This is a weird, long and untagged way ( way/384707302#map=12/51.6206/-9.3257 ). I presume that's a mistake and can be deleted?

Hi, you asked for a review. I think the only thing you did here was add the New Road to 3 different administrative relations? Is that what you intended? I don't think that's a right move, since it sorta makes 2 of the townlands invalid (geometrically). I can undo it if you want?

hello. I see you added a few ring forts. I've been using the historic=earthworks earthworks=rath tagging scheme. I've remapped all these using that, and I've also replaced them with circular ways, instead of point, because it's more accurate.

I'm glad to see someone else interested in mapping these things. :)

Hallo. Was heißt diese Node ( node/4841250133#map=19/49.04147/8.40448 ) "Batschka"? Und dieses Way ( way/492064899 )? Es hat kein Tags.

OK. Maybe we should look at the original import and see what the ID field is supposed to be. Maybe we can change it to something useful for OSM :)

Hi there! Welcome to OSM! I wonder if I could just point out a little mistake here. You've added 2 lines ("ways") here without adding any tags to them. For the first one ( way/538189246#map=19/9.49956/49.08061 ) I just added the highway=residental tag, since that seemed the most sensible.

The other ( way/543659608#map=18/9.50109/49.07471 ) was actually a duplicate and lying on top of a correctly tagged way ( way/314376669 ), so I removed it. :)

Could you tell us more about what the "training" is?

Hi there. You've added a few roads around this area (e.g. this one way/307736524 ), and you've added the "ID" tag to them, which I think is a little wrong. I don't think that tag is used by much (any) software? Did you mean to use the "ref" tag? That's for the road reference...

That's a good point. And it's such a tiny road, we can probably assume. Thanks for cleaning it up. 👍

Hi there. You deleted the (obviously) wrong maxspeed. Are you aware of the correct maxspeed? If so it might be good to add that.

OK, maybe do you wanna fix it up? 🙂

Hi. Just FYI there's a query about one of the pubs you added on this OSM note: note/1243616#map=19/51.89759/-8.46957

You asked for a review, so here it is. It's good that you added the denomination tag, since more data always helps. The more accurate and detailed we can make the map, the better! I was going to suggest that to you earlier. 🙂

If you need any other OSM help, feel free to message me if you'd like. I keep an eye on the "review requested" changes in Ireland, so that's another way to get feedback. 🙂

You asked for a review, so here it is. This looks great. Good job! 👍

Ah OK, then what you did is probably OK. 👍

Welcome to OSM! Keep mapping!

Hello and welcome to OSM! You asked for a review, so here it is.

This looks fine. Thanks for the contribution. If you're a local and know this is true, then that's all we need. My only question is if the building ( No 13 way/218177197 ) is 100% a mosque or if it's partially a house as well? If it's 100% a mosque then you're fine. If not, you should put back the "building=house" and put a node inside the house for the mosque.

Any other Q?

Would you like me to clean up the canal, or do you wanna take a stab at it?

Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review of this changeset, so here it is. I think you're trying to mark the canal as an area (right?), but you've drawn a line that doesn't join up to the start, so it's really like a weird long C shaped canal....

Welcome to OSM! You've asked for a review, and I'll have to get back to you on it, but I think there's a few little mistakes here. like the residental multipolygon relation having an overlap, and a kinda wonky wall ( way/522451532 )

Hi there. Could you tell me what's going on with the historic_1=yes tag on Dublin House here? I've never seen that before and I'm confused.

you also added a node with a building tag *inside* the other building. I've removed that, since that doesn't make sense

Hello! Welcome to OSM. In this changeset you have added a walmart ( way/538863956 ), great! But, one thing. In OSM we usually put addresses in full. So instead of "S Suncoast Blvd" it's better to spell it out full, so "Boulevard" instead of "Blvd", and if that "S" means "South", then put that in.

So "South Suncoast Boulevard" is best.

It's easy for someone, or a computer, to turn "South" into "S", but it's hard to be sure that "S" means "South". After all, does "St" mean "Street" or "Saint"? 🙂