aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 67461042 | Fair point, although I wouldn't consider it a lane, I guess the access:lanes=no implies that it isn't a lane. I've changed it back. |
|
| 68685120 | What's bicycle=stupid mean here? |
|
| 75032045 | Thanks. For the two u turn restrictions relation/10088918 and relation/10088917. Is there any use since the from and to ways are the same? |
|
| 74947990 | Sure, building=office is just a sub type of commercial. It does sound like office is more correct here. |
|
| 74947990 | https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=33_j2CiGoSuIPmoDONl23g&focus=photo |
|
| 74947990 | This does look like a fairly generic commercial building, what's the reasoning behind downgrading to building=yes? |
|
| 67461042 | The painted traffic island shouldn't count as a lane. I've changed this to have correct lane counts. |
|
| 74948167 | Did you mean to delete admin_level? government=* says it's a useful combination and I used it to say this is a federal level office. |
|
| 74830566 | Have these escalators at https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/591448312 and seen at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.935713888888884&lng=151.1651527777778&z=17&pKey=QgXdlTltdfXp4yK8grWhyg&focus=photo&x=0.39884012279205605&y=0.5745279512762695&zoom=1.3403582718651212 been removed? |
|
| 59632192 | Hi, it looks like you've mapped some roundabouts as diveded ways: way/595008484#map=19/-33.95583/150.99427
|
|
| 74613845 | Thanks! PS. When editing around here if you change to the Maxar background layer it's slightly more up to date than the default background layer. |
|
| 74615738 | Roads are assumed to be two way unless specified as oneway. Specifying oneway=no is not harmful, but not needed unless you want to be explicit or if it's unclear and you want to indicate to other mappers this really is two way even though it might look like oneway. |
|
| 74630156 | natural=wetland looks like the correct tag see wetland=* It won't show up blue if you've picked a wetland type which is mostly vegetation. |
|
| 62393198 | It was named that when I mapped it, but likely they abandoned it now. |
|
| 74567370 | reverted, seo spam |
|
| 74462393 | I've added the club=sport tag to this. |
|
| 73822580 | documenting this changeset was reverted in changeset/73962085 |
|
| 73822580 | @ecoeng Changeset comments are to provide context or a description of what the change is and why it's being made, not to make personal attacks against other contributors. I invite you to join in the discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-September/012863.html |
|
| 70970648 | @ecoeng Please see the discussion over at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-September/012863.html |
|
| 74288191 | I believe it's common practice not to name link roads (Denham Street), this is also noted at highway=tertiary_link, because in this case the link road is not really part of either road. |