Hey mate, I'm not sure I agree with changing way/626872748 to match the cadastre. I think we should map the actual use on the ground (how it was before). Those wooded areas aren't being used as recreation area, so in my view, they shouldn't be included. There is a section in the top right that's is being used as a recreation ground but isn't within this way.

Are you sure about this, in the 2015 Mapillary imagery it's oneway https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=-uigmRftXvo8YOheB6BN6A&focus=photo

Same comment re footway=sidewalk

PS. this is probably considered mapping for the router as the pedestrian area is already mapped out, however since many routers have trouble routing over areas I can see how it's useful to also map it out as a way.

See the wiki on the sidewalk tag footway=sidewalk sidewalks go along side a road, if not then it's it's not a footway.

Thanks for the reply.

I've ensured Access Trail (as signposted) is still preset by placing it in the alt_name tag.

I think it's better to set building:levels and data consumers can guess a height from that. Otherwise I suggest you add a source:height so that if someone surveys it they know that it's okay to replace if they have a more accurate value compare to it being a guess from building:levels height=*?uselang=en-AU

What's the building_1=yes tag? https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/16750738

I'm curious how do you determine building heights?

Could you provide details of this college? It doesn't look like there is any from the imagery.

Hi, Could you please provide details of this apartment hotel? From the imagery it doesn't look like there is an apartment hotel here.

the footway=sidewalk tag is for footpaths along side a road, it doesn't look like these are...

But these numbers are entered and checked by humans, and it makes it less error prone and easier to do when left in their standard formatting as used by locals. We loose that by trimming spaces, but what do we gain?

nit picking on this, but the sydney harbour tunnel shouldn't share a node with the ferry route since they aren't connected, see https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62471851

You'll probably need to add a new way potentially reusing existing nodes for the leisure=nature_reserve.

It's probably easier to do in JOSM.

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Regarding this change of name from "Access Trail" to "Barrenjoey Lighthouse Track", I added "Access Trail" as that is what the path was signposted as when I visited. Where did you find the new name?

Generally yes, I'm not aware of any exceptions.

What was wrong with the phone number format before?
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/5883822942

That's probably the easiest and safest way forward (as opposed to trying to do another mass edit), then you can go through and reapply the bus=designated to the T-way road segments (and not the nodes).

The reverter plugin for JOSM works well, it will probably tell you there's a conflict from an edit I did, but I has a pretty good UI to resolve the conflicts.

same issue here wrt bus=designated on nodes

See osm.wiki/Public_transport#Buses according to docs, bus=yes means that this public transport stop is a bus stop. It's not an access tag.