It's not really necessary to add addr:state=NSW as it's inside the NSW relation, relation/2316593. I mean it's no harm, but it's not needed.

Hi there, almost there, just need to use the building=house tag instead of landuse=residential.

Gosh, I really messed that tag up, thank you for fixing this!

I sent a note to the MS Open Maps team email since I'm seeing three overlapping ways all done by your team here.

I've fixed it up but it would be nice to work out why it's happening and if it can be prevented in the future.

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/605708363
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/609280305
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/609280306

Hi. In this changeset you changed the Wynyard Walk Tunnel way/449886905/history from highway=footway to highway=pedestrian.

highway=pedestrian as per the wiki at highway=pedestrian "is a road or an area mainly or exclusively for pedestrians in which some vehicle traffic may be authorized". This tunnel isn't a road, nor is used by vehicles, so highway=pedestrian isn't right.

I extended the name correction further west based on Mapillary (best to always use street level imagery if you can as the LPI Basemap does have some typos)

You changed way/485494547 from building:levels=43 to building:levels=43m. Was that intentional? I've changed it back.

Hey mate, a lot of those junctions you've added aren't really tourist attractions. Where did you source the names from as most I can't find any signs with the name...

I've changed the name of this buliding you entered here based on https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.84606666666667&lng=151.21128888888893&z=17&pKey=t7O8kV6gp2rKdt16Yk3DMQ&focus=photo&x=0.3799776555099217&y=0.49534388057409356&zoom=0.3653932039643033

I deleted this since it was already mapped in node/4353573990

It can be hard to tell sometimes, but I think that if sources (signage, local knowledge, etc) confirm that the building name is the address + street, then it's okay to put that in the name tag as that reflect it's name.

I deleted Sydney Harbour Bridge since it already exists in relation/3178788/

Hey it doesn't look like there's any track out to the lookout you added here, do you think it still makes sense to show it on the map? Also someone imported another one from the LPI Basemap do you know if there should be two?

Hey for the crossings per footway=*#Usage_for_crossings the accepted tags seems to be highway=footway + footway=crossing, not highway=crossing. Cheers.

Also did you survey that the roundabout way/524662407 was no longer there? The imagery can easily be outdated here so want to ensure it came from a survey.

I've fixed up the intersection around Seventh St and Airport Drive wrt pedestrian crossings, it's gone through a bit of construction but this looks permanent now. I'm not sure there was ever zebra crossings here though...

Sorry I see what you mean, you only added the relation based on existing tags on ways.

They have https://www.flickr.com/photos/136319147@N08/27873027067/in/datetaken-public/

I've updated these two in OSM now.

regarding relation/7936180 and probably a few others, the sign on the ground uses ref=A3, is there any reason you've dropped the A in the ref?

Hi, I see you added ref=TBIT here. All the signs I could see and staff I spoke with referred to this as terminal B. I couldn't see a way to have an alt ref so I've changed the ref=B. Please discuss here if you think this is wrong.

looks like this was added as a private bookmark, I've deleted it.