looks good to me, you've split rocky point road at the intersection so you can correctly add the new restriction.

what does name "site" mean here?

no idea how that street turn into three, I've tried to clean it up while still keeping the original road for history, admittedly i split it up a fair bit to add turn lanes. @xujiayi_1256 sorry if some of your turn restrictions got lost, I tried to avoid but could you double check it looks okay now?

road name types shouldn't be abbreviated
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57395207

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution!

The school already existed at relation/2016120, and the short road segment you added was overlapping an existing road so I've deleted these two. The "town houses" either need to be mapped out as individual buildings, or if you're mapping the whole area, do it using landuse=residential (I've fixed it by doing this). I've also changed over the pier to man_made=pier. Cheers.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57162222

I added the acupuncture tag according to healthcare=*#Specialities_for_healthcare.3Dalternative

ps. See name=* there are a few different name tags. loc_name would be good for a name just used by locals colloquially. That said, I don't have a problem with a commonly used name (but just not official) being used as the "name".

Agreed with @TheSwavu. See the DNRM thread at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2018-March/thread.html.

It's unfortunate but I see no other option than to revert these unless you can pull out the DNRM derived data?

I think it's fine to use the imagery, in fact even preferable, after all the imagery reflect what's on the ground, which is what we should be mapping, not what the legal boundaries of the land parcels designated for the park.

Actually we do have the necessary waiver completed, so legally can use CAPAD 2014 or 2016. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2018-March/011736.html

Also see osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things. In this case the cricket ground is better mapped with leisure=pitch + sport=cricket rather than the descriptive name.

Zhent, mind if I ask where you sourcei the name "Coomie's Walk" for way/328523397/history from?

Someone contacted me saying it was named after their grandfather and was looking to find out more about how the name came about.

Thanks, I've expanded the substation to cover the new area.

should the paths at Illawarra Fly be access=private fee=yes?

I couldn't see anything in the imagery here so I deleted it.

Welcome to OSM!

Per good practice the name tag isn't used to describe things osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

Hi, I couldn't find a ferry terminal here, so I've deleted it.

Whoops. I added foot=no because there are signs saying that track is for bicycles only, no walkers. However you're right about that short segment. Unless anyone else has better knowledge I'm happer for you to change that small section to allow walkers.

whats way/529140614 for? The Royal Botanic Garden is mapped out at relation/3744999 it seems to overlap it.

It's marked as a shared zone on the ground. When the markets are on it's more like a pedestrian, when it's weekday it's probably more like service or residential.