Hi,

In regards to way/468549230/history check up on the wiki for the building key building=*.

The building key is for the outline the each building. An area like this should be tagged landuse=residential.

Since there are a lot of buildings/concrete here is natural=grassland appropriate?

>Ok - Way: The Star (16597926) Had no tourist=attraction when I added node/43749057538 ... so not a 'duplicate' at the time? When you added tourist=attraction to this way ... that was the duplication .. delete the node?
I am not certain that the whole building is a tourist attraction.

Sorry you're right! I added the tourism=attraction after you added the node. It's hard to say if it's a tourist attraction or not but you added it as one to OSM using the old name, so I merged it into the existing object, forgetting to delete your original node.

>Way 314946608 wet and wild

Thanks for fixing this.

A lot of the nodes you've added here are duplicates of things already mapped. Eg The Star casino is already mapped as a tourism=attraction at way/16597926

Wet N Wild Sydney at way/314946608

Potentially others too. Why did you create these duplicates?

are you sure there is a bus stop here?

I've reverted this changeset, there is no bus stop here in the middle of central station.

>The LPI is where surveyors go to get the legal boundaries! LPI base map has those boundaries

I believe that except for newer LandXML submissions a surveyor will use the distance/bearing measurements on the plan, not the digital cadastre, as the digital cadastre you see in the LPI Base Map has accurancy of anywhere between 0.2m and 50m [1]

See how the NP boundary and road here don't match osm.org/#map=18/-33.62589/151.26205

It would seem to me that the actual boundary follows the road, and that the discrepancy here is simply the accuracy of the LPI Base Map data. Honestly though I don't know which is really correct, but I'm keen to find out!

[1] https://sdi.nsw.gov.au/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B0A6AA566-AFFC-4932-AC60-71144956CF77%7D

Sorry I thought you created the relation, I couldn't look at the full history as relation/4095122 has an application error. Given it's up to version 198 I'm not surprised.

>As to the southern boundary it is currently correctly aligned with the cadastre so unless you happen to have found the survey pegs I'd say that's the best available information.

There is a NPWS sign 70m from the currently mapped boundary. I suspect they just put the sign up outside the NP. I don't have a strong opinion either way of what to do. Whether to go by on the ground or use the cadastre.

>Coastline boundaries on the other hand are so vague (LPI has two different interpretations available) I'd be happy to snap it to the coastline. Trying to figure out if it's supposed to be mean high or low water would require going back and trying to find the original designation of the lighthouse reserve.

I thought all the different GIS datasets are just someone tracing from another plan/imagery, with the legal definition not where the GIS line was drawn but the coastline. If so, it makes sense to snap them all together, the LGA boundary, suburb boundary, coastline, NP boundary, etc.

Is it appropriate to use osm.wiki/Relation:land_area here?

Is the St in "Warne St Park" an abbreviation for street? See osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29

If this is a shopfront you might want to add shop=copyshop shop=copyshop to it.

Regarding way/398656117 the signage on the ground indicates the southern extent of the NP extends further. Do you think it's okay to update it to match the on the ground data? Also I suspect the boundary for the rest is simply mean high water mark, so can it be joined to the existing admin boundaries and and the coastline to match mean high water mark?

Hi there, club and sport a different tags, I've fixed this up see node/4395466707/history

I don't believe leisure=park is appropriate for way/415194166. I think it should simply be landuse=residential.

Where did you find the name "Ferndale Park Loop"? I can't find any signs with that name, I can find signs with "Ferndale Walk Track". If I don't hear back I might swap it over to map what's on the ground.

The bride is there but it's a pipeline not a footbridge. I've fixed this up via changeset/43394284.

Not sure why it was marked as a path in changeset/38993006

I noticed that you added highway=path for this https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/305534455. What was your source for this? I know first hand that it's a pipeline not a path.

Howdy, you've added way/444590126#map=19/-33.79729/151.18136 but this already existed in node/3993157057#map=19/-33.79742/151.18127

You also have mapped out two McDonalds, but there is only one there.

Howdy, it looks like you've added way/444721625 but this already existed here node/3993157061. Could you fix this up, ideally retaining the original node for the history? Also is it correct to use indoor=room, since customers can't walk into this shop, its more like a stall...