could you elaborate on the motivation for the change? Was it just that shoulder:access:bicycle=yes is assumed as default? Even then it doesn't hurt to have it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101232483

I see what you mean, but I don't think it's harmful to mark everything inside as private too, just avoids uncertainty and makes it easier for data consumers.

I added access=private to indicate they aren't accessible to the general public.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101014956

hi there were a number of tagging issues here, so I've fixed those up. If you need a hand with mapping this area, feel free to post back here I can try to help.

Hi, the building:flats is usually better placed on the building outline way, not on the residential landuse plot. The value should indicate the number of units there are in the building, so should be more than 1.

I upgraded the tagging to be a shared path allowing pedestrians access.

um what's up with https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/566854983 ?

Per note/2529948 it doesn't look like a tennis court, are you sure it's a tennis court?

Looks good. Just that we should remove cycleway:both=no when using cycleway=share_busway as they are contradictory.

Oh such a shame these ferry services seem to have stopped.

FYI not sure if you know but the coastline in OSM should be placed at mean high water mark, so if the rock ledges are usually underwanter for an average high tide, then they should be covered by the "ocean", if they are usually not underwater at high tide, then should not be part of the OSM "ocean". See natural=coastline

Just omit the access tag, because you've already specified the designated access for foot and bicycles.

What's the reason for access=no? If it's open to cyclists and pedestrians then I'd omit this access tag unless it's closed and no one can access it.

"Unmaintained Track Road" in the iD editor is incorrect as documented at highway=track#iD_Editor, so reguarly maintained firetrails should still be highway=track.

That said it could still be correct to map this as unclassified if it's deemed a road and not a firetrail, forestry access road or agricultural road.

hi this track was already tagged as access=private which signals that it can't be used except with permission. If the track is still used by the those people with permission then it still exists and should still be mapped, otherwise if the track is being closed to be removed one of the lifecycle osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix tags would be best instead of removing it just yet.

reverted see reverted see changeset/97270660

reverted see changeset/97270660

Hi, it looks like this is an undiscussed import and per osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines there is a process to doing imports like this. I've reverted your changeset here and will likely need to redact it too for a few reasons.
1. Undiscussed
2. Copyrighted data incompatible with OSM's license
3. Data model not consistent with standard OSM tags

If you could provide some motivation for doing this upload, perhaps we could identify a better way to go about what you're were looking to achieve?

Hi check out club=*#Recreation looks like club=rowing is the best way to tag this as a rowing club.

hi I reverted this changeset since there is no campsite here at the entrance in the carpark.