You're right, in the imagery I can see the dashed centerline, so it's not oneway. Thanks.

just based on the road design I'm pretty sure this is oneway. But I don't have any other evidence to support that claim.

same issue here with https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/4071253690. I've now fixed this for you to revert back before the copyrighted data was imported.

hi this is not an empty node, it's an address point, which is useful for people trying to find addresses. I've reverted you change now.

It looks like you've deleted the whole object here even though it had a history before you added the copyrighted data https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/3921515360. I've fixed this in changeset/77595085 reinstating the object before you imported the copyrighted data.

Why did you delete the building part with 13 levels? https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77555491 you can see here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.883174999999994&lng=151.1994222222222&z=17&pKey=2Kbad7xrPYXJk5pj4PRClQ&focus=photo&x=0.16499854186919266&y=0.272912570917576&zoom=0 that there is a building part which is higher than the rest of the building.

@ortho_is_hot They will all be reverted/redacted anyway see changeset/77550725

In the contributor terms you agreed to on signup https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms "Your contribution of data should not infringe the intellectual property rights of anyone else." Data from the sources you've listed is not your IP and it can't be included in OSM.

I'll need to ask the OSM Data Working to redact the data you've added as it's in breach of the contributor terms.

Are all your your other edits from the same sources?

Thanks for your efforts reverting this copyright breach @Warin61.

@Wallip FYI we are planning to import more admin boundaries from a source we can legally use, details are at osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue/PSMA_Admin_Boundaries.

What source are you using to add this data to OpenStreetMap, where are you getting your information from?

Is this whole 7 story building entirely occupied by these plumbers? If not better to use a node rather than adding it to the building way.

Did you accidentally mistag this? Australian Writers Guild as electrician?

Oh I'm absolutely in favour of including the branch in the name tag. I was just suggesting also adding it via the branch tag. That way data users can dissect the name into the brand and branch.

You can also use branch=Milperra to tag the branch.
Also per start_date=* the format yyyy-mm-dd would make this more machine readable.

I couldn't find these toilets, are you sure the location is correct?

This has been discussed before, but I can't find a link currently. I disagree with this change since you loose valuable information about the size and extent of the station, you loose information about when you can considered yourself inside central station or not. So I think this should be reverted.

Thanks!

Whats LPO?

The suburb of Sydneham is already mapped at relation/5698938 as a relation and node/3862413054 as a label node.

What's the reasoning for adding this?

A number of hiking maps do support sac_scale, trail_visibility and route=hiking see osm.wiki/Hiking_Maps.

I agree with tekim that we should refrain from mapping for the render, the name should be the name only.

I use foot=designated to say this is a signposted path for foot traffic (including signposted hiking routes, and "official" routes), and foot=yes for paths that you can walk on, but not signposted or otherwise as specifically for walking ("unofficial" route).

The level tag level=* is something most commonly used for indoor mapping to say which floor of a building something is on.

Per the wiki "For typical street and freeway crossings with bridges, layer=* should be used instead."