https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68161831/ in this changeset you've dropped the cycleway and surface attributes, I've fixed this up now, but try to watch out for this next time.

looks good now, thanks.

I didn't hear back yet, so I've gone ahead and restored these

Re https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/520768412 is this way no longer a parking aisle? To me it looks like a parking aisle as it runs through the carpark and feeds into spaces, https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/6-HMaOeNnuch3jphlbmmNw

Regarding https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/639590232 building=service is correct for buildings which house transformers per building=*#Power.2FTechnical_buildings

The bollard needs to be on the way so that routers know that this bollard affects the way. While I sympathise that you want to map each bollard individually, could you just use a count tag or something instead?

PS. I'm commenting because you requested a review to your changeset.

looks good, if you want you could add the phone number in the international format +61 2 xxxx xxxx, which is more correct.

If it's only japanese food I'd leave off the asian cuisine, I'd only use that for a restaurant that either I can't tell which specific type of asian cuisine it is, or it serves a variety of asian cuisine.

I removed this as a duplicate of node/4242642657.

It looks like you've changed building=retail to building=yes, if these are shop buildings, then building=retail would be better. Did you want to change it back?

It's okay to map private driveways in OSM, you can use the access=private tag to indicate private access, I've done this in changeset/73993556.

@WoodWoseWulf There is way/544057064 many different kinds of grasses side by side there.

In this context leisure=garden is not talking specifically about the flower bed landuse, it's saying this venue, the Royal Botanic Gardens, is a planned space set aside for cultivation, and enjoyment of plants and other forms of nature.

Those cafes are all part of the gardens venue, since this is not a landuse or landcover tag I think it's fine.

The "woods" inside are all part of the gardens.

You can think of this as a more specific type of park.

Lastly I know the name itself doesn't imply the tags we should use, but it is called Royal Botanic Garden not Royal Botanic Park.

On the other hand... the individual gardens which make up the whole Royal Botanic Gardens are mapped as leisure=garden eg. relation/3625726. So now I'm not sure, I probably still think leisure=garden on the larger area is better.

In my opinion, leisure=garden is correct per leisure=garden. leisure=garden in no way implies that the landuse is all flower beds, so it's okay to have cafes and shops, etc. inside the gardens. You can map out the garden beds individually for more detail as landuse or landcover for more detail.

When did you survey this, it looks like on a weekday this is a highway=living_street, but on the weekend acts more like highway=pedestrian, as it's closed to cars, but still accepts cars at some hours for deliveries.

No idea, I think it's okay to delete.

Looks you you've dropped tourism=hotel from way/426966792 in this changeset. I've added it back, last time I checked it was still a hotel.

The distinction in OSM between bad and horrible is very blurry, keep in mind that trail_visibilty=bad already means "Path sometimes invisible, route partly pathless", which certainly would be almost unusable or completely unusable to some people. That said I'm fine with this change, "horrible" is also appropriate for "Often pathless".

On my hiking map I render bad and horrible the same as a faint dotted line compared to the good or excellent visibility paths, see https://www.beyondtracks.com/map/#13.83/-34.11294/151.03679

Thanks for not just deleting the track, since if there is evidence on the ground of a path and people still use it and follow it, even if it's faint or overgrown, then I think we should still keep it in OSM,

reverted see osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam