aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 51289769 | Sorry I've accidentally uploaded local data, not intended to be uploaded. I've cleaned that up now. Thanks for letting me know! |
|
| 64835919 | It's a sewer conduit, either SWSOOS 1 or SWSOOS 2. |
|
| 64835919 | Some kind of pipeline, but I wasn't sure so I left it untagged. I've now added the tag, but still needs a survey. |
|
| 51397613 | ok, seems fine. Thanks for posting the details here. |
|
| 44504719 | Hi this is a public map, please don't upload your private bookmarks. I've reverted this change. |
|
| 44410681 | Hi this is a public map, please don't upload your private bookmarks. I've reverted this change. |
|
| 55565841 | Hi this is a public map, please don't upload your private bookmarks. I've reverted this change. |
|
| 51251925 | "Even it is not accordance to OSM guideline" could you point to where you formed that view? My understanding from the wiki documentation is that highway=footway + bicycle=designated is the correct tagging for this way, because the path is "(explicit) sign saying something like bicycles allowed" and a path mainly used by pedestrians. |
|
| 49812681 | Normally I would agree, but in this case they are all the one feature on the ground. https://www.flickr.com/photos/136319147@N08/35558842005 The survey mark is at the peak which is part of the picnic table and roof... all one feature on the ground so all one object in OSM. This is noted in my note "This point is both the peak of the mountain, the physical survey point on a roof over picnic tables, hence all tags are valid in combination at this point." |
|
| 51251925 | ||
| 51251925 | * I mean highway=footway, bicycle=designated |
|
| 51251925 | in response to ^, this path on the ground is highway=footway as it's primarily for pedestrians, however signage indicates that bicycles are designated, hence why I've used highway=footway + footway=cycleway. |
|
| 51251925 | > Dear aharvey,
|
|
| 67679021 | Please keep in mind that you shouldn't use maps.six.nsw.gov.au as a source, we only have permission to use the Web Services http://spatialservices.finance.nsw.gov.au/mapping_and_imagery/lpi_web_services. Although most of the time it would be the same data, it's not good practice to rely on that. |
|
| 67313396 | could you please specify a unit for the parking maxstay? way/479478321 |
|
| 65538774 | I'd also be okay with a revert of this import, due to the quality issues uncovered until they can be resolved. |
|
| 61363957 | I've fixed this. Are you really sure there is a culvert where Heathcote Brook intersects the Karloo Track? |
|
| 61160835 | I've made some changes, I've brought back way/31804884/history it's better to retain existing ways where possible, as it makes it easier to see the history of the object. Also see osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only the name tag should just be the name, ie. "Uloola Falls Trail" not "Uloola Falls Trail - Heathcote To Waterfall", I've reverted this back for you, but keep in mind for next time. Re https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/42791553 motor_vehicle=yes means the public can drive here, which is not the case, I've changed this to motor_vehicle=private which is the default for highway=track, so not essential to tag, but not wrong either. |
|
| 7680901 | Thank you! |
|
| 61363957 | Hey I just walked here today and there's no bridge at way/614134022 |