Hey mate, a lot of those junctions you've added aren't really tourist attractions. Where did you source the names from as most I can't find any signs with the name...

I've changed the name of this buliding you entered here based on https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.84606666666667&lng=151.21128888888893&z=17&pKey=t7O8kV6gp2rKdt16Yk3DMQ&focus=photo&x=0.3799776555099217&y=0.49534388057409356&zoom=0.3653932039643033

I deleted this since it was already mapped in node/4353573990

It can be hard to tell sometimes, but I think that if sources (signage, local knowledge, etc) confirm that the building name is the address + street, then it's okay to put that in the name tag as that reflect it's name.

I deleted Sydney Harbour Bridge since it already exists in relation/3178788/

Hey it doesn't look like there's any track out to the lookout you added here, do you think it still makes sense to show it on the map? Also someone imported another one from the LPI Basemap do you know if there should be two?

Hey for the crossings per footway=*#Usage_for_crossings the accepted tags seems to be highway=footway + footway=crossing, not highway=crossing. Cheers.

Also did you survey that the roundabout way/524662407 was no longer there? The imagery can easily be outdated here so want to ensure it came from a survey.

I've fixed up the intersection around Seventh St and Airport Drive wrt pedestrian crossings, it's gone through a bit of construction but this looks permanent now. I'm not sure there was ever zebra crossings here though...

Sorry I see what you mean, you only added the relation based on existing tags on ways.

They have https://www.flickr.com/photos/136319147@N08/27873027067/in/datetaken-public/

I've updated these two in OSM now.

regarding relation/7936180 and probably a few others, the sign on the ground uses ref=A3, is there any reason you've dropped the A in the ref?

Hi, I see you added ref=TBIT here. All the signs I could see and staff I spoke with referred to this as terminal B. I couldn't see a way to have an alt ref so I've changed the ref=B. Please discuss here if you think this is wrong.

looks like this was added as a private bookmark, I've deleted it.

not sure what you mean @speedwatcher34, google maps is absolutely not used and forbidden to be used in any way by openstreetmap.

hi @dhix there are exceptions but generally the maxspeed tag should just be used on the way, not the nodes too.

Speed bumps/humps/tables that have an advisory speed signposted are a common time to use maxspeed:advisory on nodes.

I couldn't find any viewpoint here so I've deleted it.

I appreciate your effort mapping this out, but it isn't a building, it's just a roof, I've changed the tagging and deleted some of the ways which weren't building features.

Hey mate, I just did the Hoddles track. You added the viewpoint node/4824600488 but we had to go off track to get to that point and it didn't show any signs of any, even a faint sign of usage by others. Yes, there's a bit of a view here, but I'm not sure it warrants to be mapped, is it any different to any other point on the cliff along the whole Illawarra escarpment? What do you think?
I also downgraded a section of the track to grade5 since it hardly shows any signs of ware, mostly it's grass without any hard materials.

Thanks, I've updated this now.

Awesome, thanks for fixing this up.