how can you tell from imagery that these are all water storage, could they possibly be other kinds of silo? eg. for grain?

+ it would be more accurate to use source:geometry since actually the source was the person who mapped it as a node prior to you. You can also leave off the source tag and instead rely on the changeset level source.

Please ensure you retain any other tags on the node, in this case it had historic=yes.

some information was lost here, before we had address 86B and then address 2/68 but you've replaced both with just 68B.

If you're not sure which applies to what best to leave the two address nodes as they are and only move the building=yes tag along to the building. I've fixed this up. If you're just working remotely probably best to leave the addresses and just change the building=yes tag from the node to the new way.

I've updated this in changeset/167911590

I've reverted this change.

I've changed the network and operator based on my prior comment.

I've restored the prior route names.

I've restored the prior route names based on community feedback at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-route-names/131624

I've restored the prior names based on community feedback at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-route-names/131624

I've restored the prior name based on this being the better route name over the artificial route name from PTv2 per community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-route-names/131624

I've restored the proper name "Dubbo XPT" based on this being the better route name over the artificial route name from PTv2 per community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-route-names/131624

I suspect the lanes:conditional should also be increased to 3 as likely it only changes by one lane during the AM lane shift. I'm not sure though.

if there's no arrows on the road or other road signs then we shouldn't be setting turn:lanes per turn=* it should only be used where there are road markings or sign markings indicating the lane guidance.

way/1396730552 turn lanes are not modelled like that, we only draw a separate way where there is physical separation, if there's just paint on the ground it's best to use the turn:lanes tag turn=*#Indicated_turns_by_lane to specify the turn lanes.

The existing way at way/40427397 already allows for routing from Spencer Street turning right into Gatton Showgrounds.

way/1396730553

I'm not sure about that one the routing will already let you turn there like this osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=-27.558516%2C152.278678%3B-27.558694%2C152.278799

usually we wouldn't model the intersection like that unless there is a large traffic island in the middle of the intersection.

The ways which join the road to the parking lots (eg. way/1396730532) should be "Driveway" (highway=service + service=driveway) not "Unclassified" (highway=unclassified). As a rule of thumb if you drive up and over the footpath it's a driveway. For example this is unclassified way/151689579

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-route-names/131624

if you had any thoughts on the matter if you could contribute to the thread please.

hi could you please reply to my earlier changeset comments about changing the route names? I might ask for wider community feedback, if you could hold off further changes until we get community feedback?

Thanks for confirming.