I just checked on the ground and it's clear that the existing route that we have coming down Hercules then into Victoria continues onto Havilah, as the signage is continuous throughout.

No rush. There was also a discussion recently on when lcn=yes should go on a way vs using a route relation at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lcn-tagging-in-australia/123529/25 but I still not sure it's resolved.

Looks good

I tweaked a few tags https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1364663766

In particular access=yes since it's open for all, but also added fee:conditional for conditions for free parking.

Also added park%20ride=*

I had added this to map the two bicycle route signage indicating from Havilah to turn to Victoria and vice versa from Victoria to Havilah. Perhaps instead we should just extend relation/6282345 to include Havilah as well? Then remove this relation I added.

hi you've tagged the whole stream as tunnel=culvert, are you sure that's correct? If the stream is open in some places, but channelled through a culvert in other places you can split the way and tag each part differently.

Looks good.

Though I know it's tricky when it's just the lane markings and no actual bicycle pictogram painted on the road or other signage, so I'll leave it to those on the ground here to decide.

We usually prefer to "map what's on the ground" osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground rather than what only appears on other maps.

node/11237813778 is not a ford, the footpath runs above the drain. I'll fix this.

This changeset has been reverted in changeset/163074921

hi sorry but I have to disagree here, based on my April 2024 and December 2024 surveys there is a footpath around the turning circle. This is not present on the 2022 imagery, so recent. When you deleted this what source/evidence were you relying on?

Thanks for improving this. Looks like you added the start in 2012 then I surveyed in 2020 and lost the track around the power line and had to bush bash out to Yanco Close, but I'd always wondered if there was a path to continue through somewhere.

Thanks for confirming you had it correct.

Please do add them on the wiki though.

As an aside, UPS was documented to use utility=power, but I don't think that's correct. utility=power was meant to mean this thing is part of the power network, ie. generation of power and distribution to consumers. Whereas these UPS cabinets are part of the traffic infrastructure, not the electricity network.

They should be power=generator + generator:source=battery (assuming they are batteries?) then utility=traffic/transport or something. I've added the power=generator to the wiki, but we should have a wider discussion about utility=*

Instead they should be

Yeah in fact traffic_signals and tidal flow signals are the only two types of street_cabinet=traffic_control I can think of. I guess variable message sign could be considered since the messages are designed to stop traffic or slow traffic or tell them one route is closed.

Per man_made=street_cabinet#Street_cabinet_categories I think street_cabinet=traffic_monitoring is a better fit than traffic_control. These devices all appear to be related to traffic monitoring rather than control, although I'm just guessing.

I guessed that TC was for Traffic Counter or Traffic Classifier based on node/12282844010 being TC. You can see the road markings where the embedded device is installed, but not sure about this location.

hi I can see a number of issues here.

1. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=178701610829910&focus=photo seems to show a bike lane between the left turn lane and through traffic lanes. while I couldn't see any bicycle signage, I think it still can be considered a bicycle lane, there's no other reason they'd paint the road like that otherwise.

2. It appears you've removed a number of other valid tags like turn:lanes and lane width tags.

I think best we revert this change, unless you had any other comments about your change?

It looks like we already have a childcare mapped at node/12311154657 which is now duplicated at way/113359611

If we only have 1 childcare here there should only be 1 OSM object marked as childcare per osm.wiki/Good_practice#One_feature,_one_OSM_element

It looks like there's also a shop in the same building, so in that case if the childcare doesn't occupy the whole building best to use the node and not apply childcare to the building.