I think that needs a community discussion that's worth opening a thread. There's several folks I can think of off the top of my head that ought to weigh in. Sub-municipal boundaries can be a controversial topic and I don't think there's a strong community consensus. Therefore I don't feel qualified to state a recommendation unilaterally!

The geometries were broken in various ways. Not in boundary relations, not connected to adjoining boundaries, and so forth. They are also not listed in Virginia's entry on osm.wiki/United_States_admin_level which suggests no community discussion occurred to add an admin level above 8. For these reasons I deemed them too broken to fix and deleted them.

Should be change to boundary=statistical + border_type=census_designated_place. This was after I curated the CDP list to match the census bureau.

Thank you!

Good catch. Sometimes this happens after an edit conflict. I'm not quite sure how to make that OP query work in JOSM though to delete them

Thanks for aligning the boundaries!

Reverted pending ongoing discussion

changeset/161614770

This topic is being discussed here, please join the discussion before editing this node:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico

Also check out this project, where I maintain validator findings: https://github.com/ZeLonewolf/wikidata-qa

Best explanation here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-to-tag-boroughs-of-new-york-as-place-boroughs/123015/2

Thanks! Should it be marked with an access tag?

See the documentation here:
access=*

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see that you added Soar Way, what is the source for that name?

Ok, everything should be set now. I reverted this changeset and re-created it correctly in changeset/160888051. Please confirm that everything looks as expected.

Whoops, must have fat fingered the wrong key. Thanks for alerting me

If Towson East is a "real" boundary (by whatever definition of real makes sense in Maryland), it should get converted to a boundary relation.

Please review this orphan boundary fragment:

way/1079645908

Intended changeset description was to update the Jennings boundary and conflate it to the FL/GA boundary

A few years back there was some drama with the neighborhood association where it was murky about the roads were private (and therefore the residents allowed to post things like the no trespassing sign). However, the 2023 document seems to resolve that as far as I can tell (am not a lawyer).

I haven't driven by here to see it in person, but at least on StreetView, it appears that the sign here says "Avenue"

Good catch, I would remove the foot=yes tag.