OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
93828947

This boundary also is missing a section: relation/7237830

93827403

I trust that you will choose the correct location of the boundary! As long as it forms a complete loop.

93827403

Hi, if you load relation/9507096 into a web browser, you should see that a piece of the boundary is missing.

93827403

Hi, it looks like the boundary relation for Berg Altena (9507096) was left in a broken state?

80341048

Hi, this relation appears to violate the guidelines at osm.wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories

93843174

Hello, in this change, you had the place node assigned to a role of "outer" rather than "label" or "admin_centre". I've changed it to "admin_centre" but feel free to change that if not correct.

90986924

Okay, should be all set for Rhode Island town/city boundaries!

Are you local?

90986924

Yes, I see what you are describing. admin_level is clearly not required on these boundary relation ways. Fortunately this is an easy fix.

90986924

Let me investigate and get back to you. Thanks for alerting me.

93620032

This looks great! Keep up the good work.

93571473

Hello, yes, on further review, my edit was probably a step too far as protect_class=22 "cultural area" as probably a better characterization of these sites versus merely "historic". I have restored the original tagging and apologies for the churn.

93565271

Yes, I understand your preference for protect_class=24 in this case.

93565271

My bad, I researched this area on Wikipedia and it seemed like aboriginal_lands alone was a sufficient fit (which is also supported by renderers). I understand if you wish to revert the change.

93317991

I attached the place nodes that had the same name as the surrounding boundary, ignoring subdivisions that didn't have a place node with a matching name. If that was not a correct assumption, my apologies and this changeset can easily be reverted.

93076553

Hi, it looks like this change broke the town border at relation/9157671

93033850

I have added this information.

93005491

Neat... but why not just "name" rather than "official_name"?

92927850

No worries, thanks.

92928207

Oops, didn't mean to make a changeset this big, sorry :(

92676026

Hello, this changeset "massive cleanup" caused a chunk of the Fletcher boundary to go missing, can you fix it?