Not an import. Just me applying attributes to areal survey with cursory knowledge of the area. Lots of farmland.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130580130

I have examined this imagery over the years and even surveyed on the ground to confirm. Not an import. Totally accurate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130608066

What is the invalid key combo? This is a community mail box with appropriate tags. GoMap!! suggested these tag keys for use.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136658707

This is an old/decommissioned rail line that is now a trail. Removed rail tag and placed highway=path tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136794017

Not an import. Adding lots of trees from imagery (geometry) and verified ground survey. Some tags were moved to relations to utilize single way methodology. Primary tags were placed on relation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137308073

Cleanup and addition of relation tags to reuse single way methodology. Primary tags were moved to relation. JOSM error checking did not discover any errors prior to committing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137935839

This was a huge modification of my early learning and many duplicate ways. This change created relations from ways to reuse the single way methodology. Primary tags were moved to relations.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143957167

This change created relations from ways to reuse the single way methodology. Primary tags were moved to relations.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138356841

What is this an invalid tag modification? It is a very helpful clarification to the map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137939229

What is invalid about this change? I’d be happy to correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143554304

What is invalid about this modification? I’d be happy to correct. It’s an important fix.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143651147

I see you added a bunch of power poles in Leavenworth. Do you know where the lines run?

Hey, I didnt realize you so recently added this relation and I should have messaged you first. But I deleted it a few minutes ago because it was causing strange duplicate rendering of the military area. The boundary seemed to be an intact area and did not need the relation. If you split it up and created the relation I apologize and feel free to revert my changes.

Thanks, I'll give it a go.

Good day, some of the tags you added to Sherman Avenue here dont look correct. Covered? It is a two lane highway. Also you added turn lanes for a long section. I think maybe you meant to split the way it it was not split.

This is exactly what I wanted to show. Now to find the historic marker and marker text. Too bad we don't better ruins tags like foundation that render. I had to use a barrier wall (which it kind of is) to make this show up. I usually don't tag for the renderer but this is a hugely historic part of the university identity and it's important to have it show up on the map.

Adding layer tag did not help the pool render above the building. test failed.

These fences are not connected to anything. Is there a reason you didnt draw the buildings and connect the fences? A changeset comment would help me know what you intended. Please provide a comment in the future.

Good day, I noticed your edits in a local city I map. Thanks for the details you add. I request you add changeset comments in accordance with good mapping standards of the OSM community. I see others have requested this 12 times. Please let us know what you are adding.

Somehow included an unintentional relation in Florida (rel 11535581). This was meant to be a local survey of a renovated park in Germany.