Thanks, I will add a note that this way leads to the car park below

Why have you removed the oneway tag? This road is one way, it leads to the newly constructed underground car park at the college - it is not possible to exit the underground car park via this road.

This road is one way, why have you removed the oneway tag from part of it??
It is the exit from the underground part of the college carpark built a year or two ago (the underground part has not been surveyed yet).

Thank you :)

Why have you removed the oneway tag??
This is the exit from the service station forecourt and motorists are not allowed to enter the forecourt via this way as indicated by local signage.

Are you sure the footpath and track east of York near the ringroad intersect?
There is no evidence that the footpath even exists, it has only been added by nbr based on information they got from council that there used to be a right of way there and has already been corrected when they marked the footpath as crossing the dual carriageway when there clearly was no crossing.
Do you have local knowledge of this footpath? otherwise the footpath needs surveying to see if it really exists or does meet the track, before people just arbitrarily join them.

Has the building really become circular??

After discussion with rsg123 about their deletion of clock and damage to Piccadilly in changeset/31477231 they told me the deletion and damage were by mistake (though slightly confused why they apologised from a different account - maybe they have 2 accounts).
I could not see any way of undoing their edit so reinstated the clock and repaired Piccadilly in changeset/31521214.
The Cut hairdresser node seems to be rsg123's creation so I assume they would be best to edit it, (though not sure why they would delete it and create new rather than simply edit it).

Yes, personally I would recommend using access=private in this case so they are not confused with public parking (it will also render with a faded "P" on some maps).

are these public parking lots or residents only parking?

Why have you deleted the clock above the Yeoman store in Blake Street? The clock is still there (and telling the correct time)
Piccadilly does not cross Fishergate

Sorry, worded that badly, I was disputing Yorkshire Housing's right to create such a regulation, than whether it was genuinely their sign. But if you think it might be a private road then I guess they are allowed to be so anti-cyclist.

I would dispute that is an official sign from Yorkshire Housing, just someone being grumpy and as there is no indication that North Moor Gardens (southern section) is a Private Road then it would need an official sign to have any authority.
Even then the written cyclist dismount is only advisory unless there is a bicycle icon in a red circle sign.

There is no indication on the York council map of what date the right of way is valid for, it may have been superseded by the dualling of the A64, there is no obvious footpath on the Bing imagery on the west of the A64. Ordnance Survey maps come with the proviso that they do not guarantee the paths are right of way (as well as deliberate mistakes).
I think a ground survey would be necessary to avoid sending people the wrong way to either a dangerous non-crossing point or a dead end.

Is there any evidence on the ground for the footpaths from Murton? They appear to go through cultivated fields, hedgerow and becks as well as crossing very busy dual carriageway with no provision for pedestrians

I didn't give it that name - it was already labelled such before I edited it. The road adjoining the footpath has a street sign Whip-ma-whop-ma-gate, but 1A Whip-ma-whop-ma-gate (where the estate agent is) is situated down this footpath.

Isn't this fiddling the data to make the Cyclestreets map work? Now the Pedallers Arms appears twice on other maps, wouldn't it be better to contact Cyclestreets and get them to fix their rendering?

Hi McRoyall, you need to connect footways to the other ways they meet or it will break any routing application

way/300655231 for clarification

The "hole" at top of New Lane is coming up on keepright as an untagged way - is it meant to be an island in the residential landuse?