These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.

These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.

These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.

These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.

These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.

These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.

These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.

These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.

Is this a test edit?

Nice additions, thanks! Seems like you definitely know the area. You can't get a lot of this stuff with armchair mapping. You probably already know of this, but in cleaning up the trails and stuff in the bear river range, I've found the Strava heatmap to be incredibly useful. You can add it as a layer, instructions here:
osm.wiki/Strava#Global_Heatmap_in_High_Resolution

Oh, I hadn't noticed that payment:bitcoin=yes was already present here. I wondered if you were going around adding XBT to random nodes across the country! Thanks for the explanation.

That makes sense. Thanks for the insights @ZeLonewolf and @SomeoneElse.

While I do personally think the data added is of questionable utility, I agree with andrebacon2 that it doesn't make sense to require going through the import process if edits are being done by hand (meaning, each change is being checked by a human.) Isn't the line between import and non-import that some edits are being made without individual human review?

What's your source for this data? Are you sure this is correct?

These roads had their name according to osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions. The name:full tag likely contains what you are looking for. Both street signage and locals referring to these roads use only the number and suffix, and omit the directional prefix.

Main Street was tagged according to osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions -
Specifically, not including the directional prefix in the primary `name=` tag. Generally, signage doesn't include it, and locals don't include it verbally.

Oh, sorry for the third separate comment. But it looks like I'm wrong - I thought you had changed the imported address format, but it looks like the other way around - my import happened to be done right after your change.

BTW, I didn't change your edits in any way. I hope my words don't come off as rude. I think the best address format is definitely debatable...

Hey! Regarding your change to the address format here, I agree that it's kind of wonky - Is the house number 1234 East and street 567 North, or should the number just be 1234? When importing addresses here, I did my best to follow the established guidelines laid out here:

osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions#Conventions

If you have any suggestions or feedback on the format of future imports (or changes that need to be made to previously imported data) I'd love to hear them! And thanks for your contributions!

Wow, I had no idea the "tree row" feature existed. Nice!!