OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
66896728

Is there some way whoever is responsible for Geog281 accounts could contact me? Nearly 100% of these edits contain some kind of error.

In this case - School and water feature was already mapped. My house is private data that shouldn't be on OSM.

66895688

A lake isn't a park, what are you trying to do here?

66895906

Why have you mapped the entrance to the cemetery as a park? Is this an error?

66886711

Please be more careful - in this changeset you dragged the end of a Towne Court way further than it actually goes and also added a park inside of an existing park.

66885670

This feature already exists on OSM - way/5493567#map=18/43.91331/-122.78006 , you don't need to add it again.

66885592

This river is already well mapped, you don't need to add another way for it.

66885556

This already exists on OSM -way/665387797

66885480

This already exists on OSM way/107098125

66884989

This already exists on OSM - way/155181236

66884906

This feature already exists on OSM way/224669548

66884715

Removed descriptive names from this changeset: osm.wiki/Names

66884603

Incorrect changeset comment, feature already exists on OSM.

66884422

This feature already exists on OSM: way/203533371

66884329

Welcome to OSM

When tagging buildings, you should use the building tag rather than describing them in the name tag.

More info here: building=*

66874007

Please don't vandalise OSM with fake edits and undiscussed changes.

66860121

Please use the park tag correctly, this isn't a park.

66862768

Hi, the correct way to tag water bodies it to use tags water=* rather than describing it in name=

66862835

Hi, I have fixed the tagging on this for you. Please avoid using name= as a descriptive tag, you should tag driveways as highway=service+
service=driveway

66862485

Hi, this feature is already on the map, here: node/357392565

66868723

This is already on the map.