WoodWoseWulf's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 67786626 | Reverted in changeset #67787210 - ongoing sock puppet vandalism issue in Rochester. See user blocks 2529, 2536, 2537, 2539, 2547, 2548 and 2558 for more details. |
|
| 67786626 | "adjustment to nat reserve" Goodness me, a semi-relevant changeset comment. But why? This is clearly a park, it has playgrounds, pitches and open green space. It isn't a nature reserve according to the website or satellite imagery. I'm going to revert this now as with your other changes, because even though your comment is accurate to the changeset, the changes themselves are not. |
|
| 60667781 | Hi, I'm not sure if you're still active, but if you are: What is this area supposed to be? You've tagged it as area=yes, but provided no further info. |
|
| 67746549 | Hi dstong and welcome to OSM! I see you're interested in adding golf features to the map, which is great. Rather than using the tag for a park for these features, which has a different meaning in OSM, try checking out the wide variety of golf tags that can be found by searching in the iD editor (the one you used to make this edit) For your reference:
Happy mapping :) |
|
| 67637649 | Hi and welcome to OSM - are you sure you meant to tag these two locations as parks? One appears to be a back yard, the other some kind of row house development? Check the OSM wiki for how we define parks: leisure=park |
|
| 67609250 | Hi potatosareawesome and welcome to OSM. Are you sure this park is here? It appears that you've added it over 4 houses? |
|
| 67539029 | Please do not add fictitious data to OSM. |
|
| 67564078 | Hi and welcome to OSM! If these are gardens, maybe they would be better tagged as leisure=garden instead of leisure=park? Both render as (albeit different shades) of green, but garden might be more accurate? |
|
| 67453532 | Hi and welcome to OSM - I'm not sure that leisure=park is the best tag for the feature you added here. What is it actually supposed to be? It doesn't appear to match what is described here:
|
|
| 67526798 | Please see user blocks 2529, 2536, 2537, 2539 and 2547 for why this was reverted. |
|
| 67505887 | Reverted. Still not sure what you are trying to achieve by deleting/editing these parks, but reverting them takes two clicks :) |
|
| 67485238 | Reverted in #67485663 and #67485659 |
|
| 67485047 | Reverted in #67485663 and #67485659 |
|
| 67485178 | Both issues reverted in CS #67485641 |
|
| 67485162 | Reverted vandalism in changeset/67485622. |
|
| 67485129 | Reverted in CS #67485598 |
|
| 67485060 | Reverted in CS #67485578 |
|
| 67485038 | Reverted in Changeset: 67485560 |
|
| 67485238 | Likely requires revert, possible part of vandalism spree, changed to nature reserve along with other legitimate parks. |
|
| 67485182 | Reverted in #67485337 - vandalism. |