Hi,
way/662758608 has been restored, this is part of the relation for Anglesea Heath Alcoa Agreement Area and is required to close the area.

It looks like both the Anglesea Heath Alcoa Agreement Area and the new entry of way/1128451034 share this area... ???

HI,
This is from a long tome ago.. but just in case you do any more of these.. 'x Homestead' is the name of the main residential building, while 'x Station' is the name for the farm..

Pitty. If there was a source we could use ther are a great many homesteads that could be mapped.

Hi
Removed some of the overlapping tree areas, 2 osm features. Any others?

Oh.. you can look up peoples change sets ..click on their 'name' and you get
@Diacritic
then look at the edits
@Diacritic/history
and then you can look for the particular changeset your interested in
changeset/130930113
and then click on the feature
node/10303591907

My stomach is grumbling...

@ Derrick_86 No need to be 'sorry' about it. We all do things when starting out - part of learning is making errors. But you must be aware that they are errors to learn from them.
OSM is vast - there is a lot to learn, just learn the bits you are interested in and leave the other bits for others :)
Any problems .. ask. May be a bit terse .. I'm off to make dinner.. bye.

Why do you have 3 things all saying 'Clayton North'???

way/1127497931

way/1127497929

relation/15088571

????

Hi,

The DCS Base Map has the 'legal boundaries' ... these differ from the fence lines in some cases.

I have added the homestead from both the Base Map and Imagery.

These are still here .. 2 years later... deleting them?

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.00740&lat=-31.97778&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Building way/1125736148 has two extra nodes .... Node: 10294226998 and Node: 10294226997 - one on top of the other. They both should be deleted.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.99340&lat=-31.98903&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Note - I don't think the relation should be there - it is a duplication of the tags on the ways... so I may well delete the relation .. eventually

Yes accidental - I needed a way to find duplications of the stream ... the way I did it was to rename one stream and then look for the others... I though I had it corrected.. I think I have it now ... sorry about that. Thanks for the catch!

Hi,
The service road here to backs over itself ...
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.27729&lat=-37.84761&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

The service road ... it is going back over itself called 'a duplicated segment' in OSM terms. It only needs to join itself at a point .. not go back to the starting place.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.15682&lat=-37.81377&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Still broken.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.88180&lat=-37.59447&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

One of the harder things to do are multipolygon relations.
The relation/15033861 - parking - is not right .. the outer ways 'share segments'. In this instance I would not have a relation ... I'd simply have a single way around the whole thing...
For the error see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.03953&lat=-37.90261&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

I have now separated way 1082604070 into 3 ... and these are now separate ways .. they don't cross themselves...

I note that 'street lamp' should be used on a node ... I have add a discussion point on osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dstreet_lamp#Ground_based_lights?

Hi,
"Bus Route 180X: Singleton Station to Maitland Station (Express Service)" is not a name but a description... something far shorter would attrack less 'attention' in the name tag? "Bus 180X Singleton to Maitland" .???

Hi,
The relation for 'South Creek' has many duplicated segments. I have removed these. In addition the relation looks like it is a duplication of the tags already on the ways ... so it is redundant?

No, keep doing what your doing.

<I'll get to the Admin . Boundary problem soon, it will leave in place things that now exist and move the boundaries to new ways/nodes.