Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 128966178 | Not interested? Relation deleted. |
|
| 129248069 | Hi,
Deleted Convention Centre building - as there is already a building there. That building is separated into a number of building:parts. Either ... don't tag it as a building or select the relevant building parts and use a site relation? |
|
| 129195362 | Hi, Couple of things with the relations.. The changes to the route relations - in particular the 'version=2' relations... these must be in sequential order with the stops/platforms at the beginning. Also the role for 'stops' should be set to 'stop'. I have fixed these. The public transport stop area... I don't think the bus stops are really connected to the train station - not many passengers would be only going from one to the other? These are simply 'near' the train station. |
|
| 127386626 | Hi, The 'four square pitch' would have 4 squares .. these have 8 squares .. so would be 2 pitches? |
|
| 128800378 | Hi, Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments ... The park relation/14877745 shares segments .. |
|
| 128868893 | Hi,
See osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#One_outer_and_one_inner_ring |
|
| 128966178 | Hi,
|
|
| 45748396 | Hi Water in this area is usually intermittent (OSM tag intermittent=yes). Some is seasonal (OSM tag seasonal=wet) |
|
| 128918318 | There are a few Quality Assurance Tools available. I use OSM Inspector .. mainly so I can check my work. |
|
| 128802104 | Hi,
|
|
| 128918318 | Hi, OSM multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments. So relation/14889547 is in error. I would use building as the footprint of the total building - not two separate ways. If you want to separate the structure for some reason then use building:part. I'm leaving this for you to fix as you see fit. |
|
| 128795538 | Hi, Welcome to OSM! Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments - so relation 14877302 is in error. There is no need to make this a relation .. better as 2 ways carrying the tags and no relation. I have deleted the relation and places the tag landuse=residential on the two ways. |
|
| 128671925 | For the final time .. I did NOT add any tags to this ... you will have to go to the mapper that added them and ask them. Out. |
|
| 128671925 | I quote from the OSM talk list
This seems to be in error, as - despite the recent tragic collapse -
The way had been marked as impassable. Can someone restore that, please?" The deletion was don by a non local. I am not local. Your not local. Shale we wait and see what a local does? Or do you want to delete the way and remove the past information from OSM? I an done with it. Someone has deleted the way for the pedestrian bridge at Morbi, India. This seems to be in error, as - despite the recent tragic collapse -
The way had been marked as impassable. Can someone restore that, please?" |
|
| 128714205 | OSm Inspector refreshes once a day. I keep an eye on it to pick up my own and those admin boundaries that get broken with road changes. |
|
| 128619514 | Reverted. Restores wetland within Lake Baghdad. Fixed tags and water way crossing. |
|
| 127966155 | Hi
But .. I don't think this is sand at all!!! See relation/14723827 |
|
| 128635165 | Hi, Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments. So the Greensborough Walk relation is in error. I have:
This simplifies the data and makes it easier to understand. |
|
| 128671925 | Further reading ...
|
|
| 128563384 | This changeset did not alter any tags.
|