OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
128966178

Not interested?

Relation deleted.

129248069

Hi,
I have reduced the Convention Center area so it no longer over laps the fountain. I do question as why the building is layer=1 ... is it not at 'ground level'???

Deleted Convention Centre building - as there is already a building there. That building is separated into a number of building:parts. Either ... don't tag it as a building or select the relevant building parts and use a site relation?

129195362

Hi,

Couple of things with the relations..

The changes to the route relations - in particular the 'version=2' relations... these must be in sequential order with the stops/platforms at the beginning. Also the role for 'stops' should be set to 'stop'. I have fixed these.

The public transport stop area... I don't think the bus stops are really connected to the train station - not many passengers would be only going from one to the other? These are simply 'near' the train station.

127386626

Hi,

The 'four square pitch' would have 4 squares .. these have 8 squares .. so would be 2 pitches?

128800378

Hi,

Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments ... The park relation/14877745 shares segments ..

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.18108&lat=-37.66048&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

128868893

Hi,
The multipolygon relation is in error ...

See osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#One_outer_and_one_inner_ring

128966178

Hi,
There is an error in relation/14893343 (building mall). Outer ways of multiplygons cannot share segments...
In this instance look at osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#One_outer_and_one_inner_ring

45748396

Hi

Water in this area is usually intermittent (OSM tag intermittent=yes). Some is seasonal (OSM tag seasonal=wet)

128918318

There are a few Quality Assurance Tools available. I use OSM Inspector .. mainly so I can check my work.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.45605&lat=-30.87017&zoom=6&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

128802104

Hi,
Ther is a duplication of a node on way 1112435432 .. this causes crossing of the way.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.49971&lat=-32.16812&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

128918318

Hi,

OSM multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments. So relation/14889547 is in error. I would use building as the footprint of the total building - not two separate ways. If you want to separate the structure for some reason then use building:part.

I'm leaving this for you to fix as you see fit.

128795538

Hi,

Welcome to OSM!

Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments - so relation 14877302 is in error. There is no need to make this a relation .. better as 2 ways carrying the tags and no relation.

I have deleted the relation and places the tag landuse=residential on the two ways.

128671925

For the final time .. I did NOT add any tags to this ... you will have to go to the mapper that added them and ask them.

Out.

128671925

I quote from the OSM talk list
"Andy Mabbett andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Sun Nov 6 19:25:59 UTC 2022

Someone has deleted the way for the pedestrian bridge at Morbi, India.

This seems to be in error, as - despite the recent tragic collapse -
the superstructure is largely still in place, and still spans the
river, according to press coverage

The way had been marked as impassable. Can someone restore that, please?"

The deletion was don by a non local. I am not local. Your not local. Shale we wait and see what a local does? Or do you want to delete the way and remove the past information from OSM?

I an done with it.

Someone has deleted the way for the pedestrian bridge at Morbi, India.

This seems to be in error, as - despite the recent tragic collapse -
the superstructure is largely still in place, and still spans the
river, according to press coverage

The way had been marked as impassable. Can someone restore that, please?"

128714205

OSm Inspector refreshes once a day. I keep an eye on it to pick up my own and those admin boundaries that get broken with road changes.

128619514

Reverted.

Restores wetland within Lake Baghdad. Fixed tags and water way crossing.

127966155

Hi
The multipolygone 'sand' relation/14723827 was in error... I have fixed that by removing an outer that was within the outer...

But .. I don't think this is sand at all!!! See relation/14723827

128635165

Hi,

Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments. So the Greensborough Walk relation is in error.

I have:
deleted the relation.
Combined the 3 ways into one.
Placed the tags on the single way.

This simplifies the data and makes it easier to understand.

128671925

Further reading ...
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-November/087868.html

128563384

This changeset did not alter any tags.
It simply deleted the way.