Hi,
Looks like your edits are breaking route relations ...
8014084 Syd to Newcastle
9806975 Berowra to: Richmond
8406942 from: Sydney to: Brisbane
8406939 from: Armidale to: Sydney

Note: These are version 2 relation and need the route to be in sequential order - start to finish. The tracks are still in ht eroute but the section you have altered is in the wrong order.

Hi,

No rolls on ways in relation/13349345, corrected. Also had crossing ways ... corrected using bing that gives more detail detail to tree area.

The changset has:
Comment: Added Great Western Woodlands boundary
imagery used : Bing; OpenStreetMap Carto (Standard)

So, I ask again: What is the source of the geometry?

And the second question: Protected by who? Arr .. here we go .. a website tag would be good to https://www.dpaw.wa.gov.au/management/off-reserve-conservation/the-great-western-woodlands

Hi,
This area is not all trees! So it cannot be tagged natural=wood. I have removed this tag.

Tagged as 'protected area' .. protected by who/what???

What is the source of the geometry? This cannot be satellite imagery as it does not follow a natural tree/shrub/water line.

Why a relation?

Hi
Changeset has broke water relation/10214684

see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.41643&lat=-36.51880&zoom=13

Leave it to you.

Hi,
The relation for the light house is not correct. Outer ways cannot touch one another.
What is wanted is building:part=* See building:part=*

I have changed this.

I believe MapshareVic is NOT suitable for use in OSM.
See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

I note that MapshareVic also states that some of the data is from other parties that may need to be contacted for their permission to use their data.

In short do not use t MapshareVic data. Unless you have written permission to do you - in which case produce it.

1) it is NOT possible to source this from the imagery stated.
2) the area over laps the Fryers Ridge Nature Conservation Reserve.
3) state forests are not nature conservation reserves - they are landuse=forest.

I am awaiting a response to the copyright issue - I have had one, but not on any changeset and on the subject of deletion of Fryers Ridge State Forest.

Nev - see changeset/112486478#map=12/-37.1502/144.2874
Part reversion of this changeset. Possible full reversion of this and other changesets too.

MapshareVic is copyright and not approved for use in OSM?
See

https://www.delwp.vic.gov.au/copyright
osm.wiki/Australian_data_catalogue

Please cease using this data.

I have deleted Fryers Range State Forest way/992153454. and restored the relation for Fryers Range State Forest that was effected by a past changeset.

The way tagged here as Fryers Range State Forest (992153454, v7) looks to overlap the Fryers Range Nature Conservation Reserve...

Are not 'State Forests' operated to produce timber? As such they are not 'parks' nor 'nature conservation' areas. Those are secondary rolls... OSM should map the primary roll ..

You should fix this.

No need for apologies...

I too suffer from missing emails amongst the number that come daily. Really need to set up some filtering. And weed out the older messages too.

Err...
Why have you deleted the outer ways for relation/1013829 oh .. and the name 'Fryers Ridge State Forest'???

Deleted.
Area is not entirely scrub, nor does it stop within the rectangular area.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

Adding things that have no tags ... well the software will not be able to tell what they are.

See
way/984863508
way/984863509#map=19/-33.66255/151.14136

The relation/13263246 for Bilinga Beach has several problems:

Shared segments in outer ways - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.50362&lat=-28.15080&zoom=18

More than one object is tagged: landcover and natural - either one or the other.
The name .. one of the ways is tagged with another name... so which is it?

---------------
Suggest .. delete the relation. The tags on the ways are ok.. if the name Tugan is correct for the beach northern part.

Note:
The relation above generates errors on a QA tool. You should fix this.