Yay, confirm fixed.

And again with relation/13166719.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=130.83012&lat=-12.45686&zoom=14

Similar problem here with relation/13168250.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=132.28272&lat=-14.46585&zoom=17

Hi,
The relation/13166475 is not correct. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=133.30064&lat=-14.95398&zoom=17

The simple solution? There is no need to separate out the school from the residential area. So tag the outer way as landuse=residential etc and delete the relation.

Note relation/12114121 is borken, and now being rendered as treeless.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.51986&lat=-36.69353&zoom=11

Hi,

The road is broken into pieces so it can be used as the boundary between suburbs. By joining it into one the boundaries don't make sense.
See the DCS Base Map for boundaries - faint lines.

Hi,

Can you correct way/977500980?
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.67070&lat=-30.21722&zoom=17

You may like to keep an eye on that site to see if there are any more errors of a similar nature?

Hi,
this breaks administration boundaries. I'll fix it tomorrow.

Hi,
Suggest you monitor https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.41137&lat=-36.79477&zoom=10 for any errors you create.
This tree area is now not closed.. and may eventually not be rendered.

Hi,
Both relations you changed are now not closed areas. Basically you have removed the boundary between these 2 areas.
The source of the entered boundaries is the Government, correct ~1 year ago. What is your source that they are wrong?

In the mean time this changeset has been reverted in order to close the 2 boundaries.

If you go back in history .. those tree areas were even bigger... I have broken them up into smaller ones .. still large but there is other stuff to do.
Good luck with it.

HI,
I have removed the relation for Halley Park and made it into a simple closed way. The relation was not closed and used the nodes for a residential landuse relation. The new way is independent of the past data.

Yep. Looks good.

I'd not add layer=1 .. it is 'on the ground' which is taken as layer=0 - the default layer.

relation/12114121 is not closed. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.43335&lat=-36.76260&zoom=12

Suggestion: do NOT chose existing boundaries for other unrelated features for these tree boundaries. Doing so means any changes to these other things may (will) break the tree relation - thus making more work.

Hi,
I have corrected relation/12871880. Both ways within the relation had tags the same as the relation, this is an error. The relation should, in this case, carry the tags. The inner and outer ways should and not have the same tags as the relation.
A tag on the outer way would apply over the entire area of the way .. so an inner way would not exclude those tags. A tag on the inner way would apply over the area of that way. Having every thing tagged as a building means a building everywhere, no hole in the middle.

Hi
relation/13088827 ... err no ...
See building:part=* ... building:part is not a function of a relation.

Hi,
The relation/13042216 has an error .. and it makes no sense?
Multipolygon relations are made for;
things that have holes inside them ... this building does not?
things with lots of outer ways - that connect together to form a continuous area ... this one does not?

I think you wanted to signify the separation of the roof area into 2? In which case look at the tag building:part=*.

This line has been fixed by restoring way/141163412. If you want to remove it then the route the XPT takes has best be updated to what ever it uses.

Hi,
The Sydney to Brisbane XPT route relation now has no path through this area. Between Way: Interstate Line (138214723) and Way: Interstate Line (974906366) ... how does the train travel???
The relation is 8406942.

Hi
I have deleted the parking relation as it;
did not from an area.
went from the road centre.

If you want to indicate parking is available here but it is hard to map the actual area due to the tree cover ... simply place a node about here it is .. handy if you include the capacity...