Ok ...
I'll put it into OMH then. Could be a cool place to visit in hot weather.

Hi
These embankments look to be the wrong way around .. the low ground in on the other side.

Look at the DCS topographic map for reference.

Hi,

I've been looking at tagging, local to me, an arboretum. And I came across this as one of the earlier ones. Looks like it still is, combined with the cemetery. You have it tagged as a nature reserve... would arboretum not be more specific and appropriate?

Now 2 Munday Swamp with tags leisure=park

way/877745804

relation/12531083

Delete one?

Name is for name only.
See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Areas of trees are better tagged 'natural=wood'. The key 'landuse' is for the human use of the land, not for what is there ... with the one exception of 'grass'.

2 months.. not fixed...

Multipoygon relation outer ways cannot share segments.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.46193&lat=-33.09711&zoom=18

I'll leave you to fix it.

Nothing about a new url .. but on facebook https://www.facebook.com/officialhrfc/

Closed due to Covid .. but they hope to be back when it is 'safe'.

Hi
Did you mean to change the administration boundary for the post code 3004 (relation/3402721)???

Ug. The multipolygon relation shares outer segments .. so that is an error.

I have deleted the relation and combined th eouter ways into one way.

So now the single building is one way - truly singular.

Oh .. if this is a reserve then it should be tagged as a reserve, not an area of trees.

Renders change what they show depending on magnification. They do this as 'over developed' places have too much information that would overwhelm the map without reducing what they show.

Hi,

Multipolygon relation is not closed. Note source is childish.

Hi,

Small error - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.59278&lat=-28.79454&zoom=18

You missed some ...

e.g
way/729076806/history

opps "cannot share segments"! not 'shere'

Hi
Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot shere segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.95643&lat=-20.34661&zoom=18

Note: source 'aerial imagery' does not say which imagery was used.. Bing, Ersi, Maxar, ?

To me it looks like the south west section is a covered walkway and would then be best entered as a simple way tagged highway=footway, covered=yes.

Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments.

relation/12513626 has been deleted and the 2 ways correctly tagged one as house the other as roof.

These 'Tanks' are not buildings out here, they are reservoirs, no roof + built up embankments to contain water