Presently way/169174227 is tagged;

name=Blue Mountains National Park

boundary=national_park

This covers a very large area ... that is;

part of the Blue Mountains National Park (not the northern section)

all of;
Yerrandrie State Conservation Area
Yerrandrie Regional Park
Nattai National Park

And others.

I have raised this on the talk au list and had this response
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2016-January/010865.html

I have added LPI sourced relations for things in this area. As such this way taggs are redundant.

Presently way/169174227 is tagged;

name=Blue Mountains National Park

boundary=national_park

This covers a very large area ... that is;

part of the Blue Mountains National Park (not the northern section)

all of;
Yerrandrie State Conservation Area
Yerrandrie Regional Park
Nattai National Park

And others.

I have raised this on the talk au list and had this response
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2016-January/010865.html

I have added LPI sourced relations for things in this area. As such this way taggs are redundant.

Presently way/169174227 is tagged;

name=Blue Mountains National Park

boundary=national_park

This covers a very large area ... that is;

part of the Blue Mountains National Park (not the northern section)

all of;
Yerrandrie State Conservation Area
Yerrandrie Regional Park
Nattai National Park

And others.

I have raised this on the talk au list and had this response
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2016-January/010865.html

I have added LPI sourced relations for things in this area. As such this way taggs are redundant.

Presently way/169174227 is tagged;

name=Blue Mountains National Park

boundary=national_park

This covers a very large area ... that is;

part of the Blue Mountains National Park (not the northern section)

all of;
Yerrandrie State Conservation Area
Yerrandrie Regional Park
Nattai National Park

And others.

I have raised this on the talk au list and had this response
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2016-January/010865.html

I have added LPI sourced relations for things in this area. As such this way taggs are redundant.

Presently way/169174227 is tagged;

name=Blue Mountains National Park

boundary=national_park

This covers a very large area ... that is;

part of the Blue Mountains National Park (not the northern section)

all of;
Yerrandrie State Conservation Area
Yerrandrie Regional Park
Nattai National Park

And others.

I have raised this on the talk au list and had this response
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2016-January/010865.html

I have added LPI sourced relations for things in this area. As such this way taggs are redundant.

Presently way/169174227 is tagged;

name=Blue Mountains National Park

boundary=national_park

This covers a very large area ... that is;

part of the Blue Mountains National Park (not the northern section)

all of;
Yerrandrie State Conservation Area
Yerrandrie Regional Park
Nattai National Park

And others.

I have raised this on the talk au list and had this response
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2016-January/010865.html

I have added LPI sourced relations for things in this area. As such this way taggs are redundant.

This added a name to a road - "Corkwood Woongarrah, New South Wales" and also oneway=no .. and not added any maxspeed.
This bot is eitehr broken or not doing waht you think.
way/26539309.
Recomend more care in creating bots. And more testing of the bot!!

I hope that is fixed now....
Apologies. I'll check it tomorrow - things to do.

Complements for catching it ... how did you come across it?

Working on it
Josm find - type:node name=Edensor Road
then delete name and source:name...

Nooooooooo !!!!!!!!!!!

I have removed the name and leaf type from this relation!!!
Area encompasses National Parks and private property and other State forests too.
Trees are both needle leaved and broad leaved.

What is the source?
Specifically way/375640928 ... LPI has that area as a state forest ... not a conservation area.

Hi,
'We' now have LPI base map data - you will find this much easier to use to plot out the National Parks outer boundaries, not so good for park to park boundaries. I think the LPI data is better than the dep of environment. It does include State Forest too. See what you think... I have looked at the Dorrigo and New England boarders .. think they could have some corrections?

HI,
I'm not an ID user .. So I used JOSM to check this area.. ('validation') this reports 14 errors and 49 warnings. Of these 12 are 'way end node near other highway' .. these should be checked if they should be joined. Of course the 'errors' too should be checked... and I have just done some reduced to 10.. these appear to be turn restrictions and may need local knowledge. However having 'fixed' these .. the way end node near other highway' have reduce to some 6! Demonstrating the importance of fixing 'errors' first.

way/25968044 Barrington Tops National Park ... WAY too large!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I know that part of this area is a state forest .. camped there many times!

What is your source of this claim?

The NSW Department of Land and Property Information has, I think, much better information ...

way/232137774 looks to be way too big!!!
The area tagged as State Forest has National Parks inside it!
I will delete this way .. and add data from LPI for the various state forests and National Parks .. smaller areas.

OK. I think the LPI information includes an easement .. possibly an old stock route. I think the NP&WS do not want to advertise these easements.
Also your data has corrected my error in overlooking a line.
I have 'updated' the boundary to the LPI data.

What us the source of the information?

NSW Department of Land and Property Information (way/385932033) has a different boundary for this nature reserve. I have added it .. and made this way into 'obsolete' .. Please comment back as to if this should be deleted.
My changeset for this 35957441.

Please be carefull in reducing detail. Better with too much rather than too little. I generally add detail that then reduce it! Zooming out general reduces the detail anyway ... only when you zoom in do you see the detail.. and that is when you want the detail.
Secondly .. better imagery is now available! LPI base map has details on park boundaries .. and LPI imagery (sat view) has much better resolution too
See @Warin61/diary/37528 for JOSM instructions .. sorry don't have ID.

Carefull
profile.id is for the area of Chatswood .. not necessarily the residential area only. e.g. this includes a golf course that could easily be excluded. It also overlaps previously tagged residential areas.