In this case there is only one mapped way around the whole thing ... with all of the tags on that. No relation.

If the individual segments require separation then add separate ways as building:part. Still no relation.

Shared segments in relation...

Learn how to do multipolygon relations .... ...................................................................................................

Relation relation/19795228 deleted - conflicts with
address nodes.
separation of buildings
only has role 'inners'.

Hi,
This construction is now finished? Can you confirm that the train route that use these lines under construction can now use them ... that they continue to use the same lines (the northern side of the station)???

These are ONLY buildings.
See landuse=farmyard

"An area of land WITH farm buildings"

Secondly the name of the farm should be placed on the total area of the farm not just the buildings or the farmyard...

relation/20165239 ... deleted.

A RELATION is NOT needed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Simply tag the ways.

This is NOT the way to make multipolygon relations!

Part revert

Part revert.

You are making problems!

Relation: 3019792 Not closed.

way/227239058 is empty.

Please FIX your own errors?

Hi,

I have made some changes to 'East Village - building part, m glass roof and garden. Issues with relations ... I have repaired the relations as best I could but you should look at them to check if I did something wrong? Changeset: 178650501

HI,

The tree relation/3834805 has 3 members with the incorrect roles... Take a look at
Way: 1470845270
Way: 1470845269
and
Way: 1470869002

Think you'll agree these should be 'outer'.

Hi
relation/20197234 pedestrian way has an error
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.19183&lat=-33.87358&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

HI,
JOSM would have given you a warning about way/1476332380. That has something you should fix...
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.56015&lat=-32.75023&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

No communication.

HI
The relation/20072835 Dart Bridge Conservation area has an outer within an outer ???

HI,
There is an error in Alpine National Park relation/2248617 - not closed.

That should be "I thought you were adding parks rather than adding a tag to existing parks? " :doh!

Sorry. I thought you were adding parks rather than adding a tap to existing parks?
In this changeset you're adding a new park ...

The email needs to be copied so anyone can see it and if necessary verify it.
.. and it should be done in the data sources page? osm.wiki/Potential_datasources
I wonder where the boundaries for this new park come from? Do the pota have the rights to the data such that they can pass the data on??? Have to read their email...

HI
Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. So the relation has been deleted.

The 3 buildings are now tagged building:part=yes
A new way mapping the 3 buildings foot print has been created with the Sargood Centre tags.