This one just stuck out. I tried to contact the original mapper and have not response for serval weeks and so .. deleted.
If you know of others it would be worthwhile to contact the author and see what they say .. if no response after several weeks go ahead and delete them.

HI,
This does not look to form a single route? Might be a collection of ways that a government website uses to generate a route?

Meryla Flora Reserve nee State Forest - open.
https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/visit-a-park/parks/meryla-flora-reserve

Hi,
Fire trails that are navigatable by vehicles are not OSM paths but tracks as a minimum. The access may be restricted using the access tag, that could be motor_vehicle=private to indicate that management vehicles could use the track while the general public could be excluded.

Hi
Is the pub now closed?

Hi,
The 'Bruce Ridge MTB Trails' relation/5341192 looks to me like a collection of mtb routes? And each of these routes now have their own relation? In short I think the relation/5341192 can be deleted .. as each individual route is now mapped and a route relation should be a single route not a collection?

The government documents don't look to form a route from one place to another but rather to document bicycle infrastructure e.g. bike lanes? Some linkage is shown between the bike lanes.
Are the routes all sign posted with the same 'name'?

The tagging in NSW looks ok. I am not so certain in other parts.

Duplicate tagging is done in various forms in OSM ... seasonal and intermittent for instance. I did nodes so I could be certain of finding them again, they would be 'better' as duplicate relations but then some would say overlapping landuse areas. You cannot win :))

I don't think public access by motor vehicle is allowed... locked gates at access points would indicate that?

The idea is to to avoid the multiple meanings of the tag landuse=forest (as explained in the page Forest) by using the tag landuse=forestry. I never got around to duplicating the relations but used nodes to get an idea of the number. With the increasing pressure to stop all logging and transfer State Forests into National Parks there looks to be little point.

Access for HGVs, buses, taxies etc etc... Are these all to be stated?
The access=no means no access unless there is a following dedicated tag .. such as in this case foot=yes, bicycle=yes and motor_vehicle=private (to allow NP service vehicles) ...

Hi,

Is this route signposted?
Most of the route looks to be on paved roads with no cycling infrastructure.

Hi,
The tracks in the Blue Mts National Park would allow access to parks maintenance and fire vehicles. So might be better tagged access=no, motorvehicle=private, and some foot=yes, bicycle=yes.

Hi
I have moved the ConocoPhillips Australia office across the road to a building with the same name. node/2353502584.

Opps..
Failed to edit comment and source.
Source bing.
Comment
Changeset: 164103412

Australia, WA, South Dwellingup. Add more mining hall roads and a conveyor belt.

Ops .. forgot the + ...
thanks.

Not been there yet, hopefully Sept this year. I usually check OSM areas that I look to visit so I can improve the map as much as possible before a visit. Then take notes during the visit.
I am trying to get some consistency across the Munda Biddi campsites.
Basicity I think the tourism=campsite should contain the hut, toilets, water, bicycle parking and tent pitches. The sites here would be tagged as pitches .. as per the OSMwiki and what has been done at another Munda Biddi site.
On the visit I hope to detail track surfaces and camp site approach trails as access=private, bicycle=yes. + anything else I think of.
Any thoughts?

Hi,
Are these 2 camp sites part of the Yarri camp site for the Munda Biddi?

Thanks for this, much better than those intersecting areas.

Hi,
Strictly speaking campsites (and other facilities like toilets etc) are not 'alternatives'. Probably best in a new relation .. 'facilities'??

Anyway I'm looking at doing this in Sept, so tidying up the near camp grounds and will probably look at supermarkets and general stores along the way. Probably fill in some of the trail surfaces, generally just paved and unpaved unless an associated way has a more detailed tag and it looks the same.

Regards.