Hi,
The Watreloo Rd bicycle route ... there does not appear to be any signs (a display of the name on a public notice along the route) . Further some of the 'cycleway' is incorrect in that there is no bicycle permission evident in some parts...

Following personal survey by bicycle I have deleted the relation and corrected some of the 'cycleways' to footpaths.

How many of these bicyle routes fail the required 'named or numbered or otherwise signed routes'? See osm.wiki/Cycle_routes

Not a 'power line' person but I came across this 'route' .. was interested but could not reconcile my concept of 'route' with power lines.

The KTS SBY are abbreviations ... be nice to know if there were some way of confirming the ref values given. But this is a distraction from the 'route' issue.

I have remove some of the bicycle=designated as there is no on the ground indication. Possibly a gov map may make the claim but that may not have been implemented...

Have a read of osm.wiki/Proposal:Power_routing_proposal

Hi,
Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments.
This particular relation is not required .. further the ways should be combined into one way and even combined with way/1304201064 ... as both tree areas are adjacent with one another..

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.99612&lat=-31.89578&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi
Welcome to OSM. You are very valuable as a local contributor getting stuff 'us' remote contributors cannot see.

However there are 2 errors from this changeset that I have corrected. It is ok, we all make errors, more frequently when we start out. So;
The library building is not part of the bus route, So I have removed it from that relation. The library building is also part of the uni and is already within the boundaries of that relation so it does not need to be listed there, so I that removed it from there too.

Keep mapping, don't fear the errors, some will be picked up and fixed rapidly.. others may take some time to be found.

The name tag is for the name only .. not descriptions.
e.g. name=barn already correctly tagged building-barn.

Read osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

What are you trying to do???

These ways should not be named!

Why???

This makes no difference, none. Why do it?

The way should not be named!

Hi,
You change the role of a way in a multipolygon relation from 'outer' to 'inner' ... make no sense as it is the outside edge of the trees.

The comment 'boundary line reversed ' is also puzzling as the direction of a boundary line makes no difference to anything???

The relation role has been corrected.

Hi,
OSM multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments.
I have deleted the relation and made a simple way with the tags .. see way/1112469850

Hi
Were the M2 crosses Devlins Ck.. the M2 made a bridge here .. there is no culvert nor tunnel .. but a bridge. This is knowledge from before the M2 was constructed.

Thanks BaileyNelly and nevw.

Don't think it would be a 'park' then,

Could be boundary=hazard, hazard=contamination and even contamination=lead ...

relation/17803642 is wrong in several ways...

building= one thing or the other not hospital;roof..
Multipoygon outer ways cannot share segments!!!

--------------------- corrections...

way/17803642 building=roof, layer=1

way/276984375 building=hospital, name=Normanby House

This simplifies things to one OSM entry for one feature.

Hi,
The multipolygon relation for the picnic site does not meet the 'multipolygon rules'. I have deleted the relation. Made the south western area into the camping area, and thee north eastern area into the picnic area. See what you think?

I have removed this 'park' from the Marine Park.

The 'park' appears to contain some houses... The 'park' does need some explanation.. does not appear on the Regional Council webpages.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

For information... multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments.
relation/17806381 has been deleted. What were the outer ways are now tagged building=retail.

The bing imagery looks to have an offset to the OSM mapped roads by 5 metres..

The different tool looks to be metro only .. that would not cover the Gahn, India Pacific etc.

These and not part of PTv2 'stop_on_demand', 'stop_entry_only' etc. Useful - yes. But not part of the original PTv2. These additions should make it a new version...