The 'Big Desert Wilderness Park' ... has areas of sand... "area of sandstone ridges, sand dunes, mallee scrub and heath."
See https://www.wimmeramalleetourism.com.au/big-desert-wilderness-park/

Note that 'scrub' can be views as 'trees' in satellite imagery...
-35.673 140,950 and 35.755 141.060 looks to be sand to me...

Hi
Large parts of the tree areas mapped here don't have trees. It would be better to map them are multipolygon relations so that the holes in the tree areas can be added...

Hi,

Most buildings are 'square' their corners from right angles.
Some of your mapped building have very strange shapes - please take more care with your mapping. Do you have a task co ordinator? If so seek their assistance.

HI,
Most buildings are 'square' - their corners from right angles. Pressing the 'Q' key will square up your buildings while they are selected.

Hope that helps.

HI,
Most buildings are 'square' - using right angles for their corners. Use the 'Q' key to square buildings when they are selected, this will improve your mapping.

Hope that helps.

Advice?

If you cannot clearly see it, don't map it.

Most buildings are 'square' - using right angled corners. Use the 'Q' key to square up what you have mapped while the feature is seleted.

Hope that helps.

Hi,
Some problems with relation/17427562 - Central Creek Linear Reserve / grass

First the relation inner way touches an outer way .. that brakes 'the rules' for multipolygon relations.

And then why use a relation at all? Simply tag the outer ways with grass and be done.

Then the issue is the name 'Central Creek Linear Reserve' .. this suggests a leisure=nature_reserve - independent of the land cover of grass ... I think it would include the trees?

What do you think?

Residential relation/7656605 now only has inners... broken.

This has removed all but 2 of the outer ways on the residential multipolygon relation/7656605 .... now broken.

I have reduced Wentworth Leagues Club - and added Ringrose Park - operated by the council...

Hi,
I think you have forgotten this broken bus route relation/13332390...

Thanks.. how did I miss that?

Hi,
Roundabouts should be tagged "junction=roundabout' then the tag 'oneway=yes' is redundant. This helps routers recognize that there is a roundabout.

Hi,
Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.32336&lat=-38.23221&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The simplest method to correct this is to place the tag 'landuse=residential' on each way and then delete the relation.

I'll leave it to you to make a correction?

Hi
The residential relation/17351391 outer ways share segments. This is an error.

I have combined the 2 outer ways into one, added the tags to that outer way and then deleted the relation. This is simpler than the relation.

Looks like a 'no'.

I have deleted the added ways that have no tags - and added the existing ways that are tagged as road in there place. I have deleted the duplicated bus stops .. and retagged 'stop_position' as 'platform'. I have placed the bus stops at the front of the relation and the ways at the rear - all in sequence. I have corrected the roles in the relation. Over 100 objects deleted.

This might fix it. Might.

When do you plan on repairing the broken PTv2 bus relations you have broken? There are 8 presently ...

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.19485&lat=-33.63775&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=149.07456&lat=-35.06379&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

Hi,
The park multipolygon relation ... has an error.
The outer ways cannot share segments.
I have deleted the relation and tagged both ways as leisure=park.

Those warnings that id gives you .. are possible problems that you should look at fixing before you upload the data ... e.g.
"warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part" is a park relation that has been broken by this changeset. Sometimes the warnings are wrong.. in this case it was correct.

Partially reverted to restore residential relation/7609253

Partially reverted to restore residential relation/7609253