OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
115660915

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.
Parking areas should only include the area used for parking, not the entrance/exit approns. I have modified one of your entries - see way/1017528949#map=19/-32.24735/115.84645.

The entry/exit can be mapped as a simple way tagged highway=service, service=driveway, surface=paved.

The changeset comment is not too good - see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

115661757

Hi,
The landuse=retail way/1017532915 should only be for the area that is used for retail - not extended out to the road centre lines. See way/1017532915#map=19/-32.24735/115.84648

115661194

Hi,
The guide is one feature = one OSM entry. For the way: Goodstart Early Learning (1017530386) this should not only include the building but the play area out the back and the parking area at the front?
I'd leave the building tagged as the building, and transfer all the other tags to a new larger way... I have left this one alone for you to think about.

115596480

Hi,

I have corrected the relation/13618816 for Proclamation Track as it had errors

It would be nice to enter the other sports here. See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/sport=discus_throw%3Bhammer_throw as a sample.

115497625

Hi,

OSM 'boundaries' are not for natural features but man's officialdom - such as National Parks, city, suburbs and villages boundaries. See osm.wiki/Relation:boundary

As you look to have made several of these 'boundary=natural' may I leave you to correct the tagging?

The relation/13477781 has a member (Way: 1006012131 "natural"="water") with the role 'inner' .. but it is outside the relations outer ways. I have removed it from the relation.. but it possibly belongs in another relation??

115448248

I've done the same on a few of these 'touching ring' things.
I understand it is difficult for computers to recognize things humans understand with little thought... pitty about that.

115408243

Done.

Place all the ways in the relation.
Delete the duplicate tags on the ways.
Break the ways where they overlay each other. Delete the overlaps.

----------------
I have also removed landuse=forest and replaced with natural=wood.

115405140

Hi,

The source "MBRC Planning Scheme ... I cannot find that on osm.wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Queensland Would you elaborate on it?

relation/13599313 makes no sense?
An outer within an outer??? What does that mean?
And then what is the relation other than an address? If it is just an address then a node would suffice.

115406768

Hi,
Part reversion to restore pedestrian relation - restores deleted way/482481220.

115408243

Hi
The relation for Robina Waters 6467511 is very confused. A section of water to the north of Robina Island is not part of Robina Waters yet to both the east and west those sections of water are part of Robina Waters.

As an error Robina Island is mapped as an inner for Robina Waters .. yet it is no longer inside the outer way ... so should be excluded ... unless the northern water is actually part of Robina Water...???

88966381

Hi,
Just noticed this... nit picking but ...
The 'farmyard' way/173909018 is a land use - not the legal boundaries but the use to which the land is put. And talking about that - some of this area is for land use residential ... human swimming pools are not part of farm yards.
The other point it that the present mapping shows the area covered by trees. This can be corrected by making 'inners' in the tree relation.

79722595

The NAME of the shop is not 'Snow Gear and Equipment'.
See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

114987565

Hi
relation/13555927 is not closed (landuse=farmland)

See relation/13555927#map=16/-34.5526/146.0056 and https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.00382&lat=-34.55385&zoom=15

114380635

Hi,

These beach 'names' look to be 'descriptions'?

See
osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
description=*

Also .. I would add the tag 'surface=sand' to these beaches. See natural=beach

114599100

Oh.. the over lay beach is

way/1007169299#map=17/-37.78032/148.96874

114599100

I have removed the offending way.

The entry of the beach 'Tamboon - Sydenham Inlet'/Tamboon Inlet' over lays a past entry of the beach 'bemm river'.

All these 'names' look to me to be 'descriptions' ...
See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

And description=*

114601479

Hi,

What is the source of the beach name 'Tamboon - Sydenham Inlet'?

114722204

Hi,

The 'name' of the beach looks to be a creek name. What is the source of the beach name?

A reminder of my past comment .. the beach could have a surface of rock or mud. See natural=beach ... I suggest using the tag surface=sand.

114947231

Hi,

There is an error in the method used to map these 2 buildings - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=142.47957&lat=-38.37850&zoom=18

For way/1012329935 they should be 3 separate ways as they are 3 separate buildings.

For way/1012329933 ... I make it 7, yes 7 separate buildings.

Consider using other imagery ... Mapbox looks clearer here compared to Bing.

One tip: square up the buildings using the key 'Q'.

114863100

.