Hi

The relationship roles need to be swapped.

way/960956145 should have rolle 'outer' as the outermost way - the outside of the building.

The other 2 ways should have the role 'inner' for the inside walls of the building.

If you want to help 'fix' things then see
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=175.23999&lat=-38.91326&zoom=7

Hi
way/959936573 - building .. has an error .. two segments share a path. What you have tired to do is make a hole in the building.. that cannot be done with a simple way. The normal method of making a hole in some thing is to use a multipolygon relation, see osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon
I leave it to you to fix.

Not only shapes, colours and surfaces- those can come from the imagery.
But the other attributes - names, elevations that can come from other sources e.g. survey, knowledge..

In short - where the source is to be given in the changeset just state everything that is used, disregarding any 'confidence checks'?

Hi,
I have changed your 'bear_rock' entry for Cape Trib.
The rock does not stop at the coastline but continues on.
I have intergrated the other edge with the tree line.

I note that the coastline here is incorrectly mapped - it should be at the high water mark. Also the beaches would be better mapped past the coast line in many areas.

-----------
The reason why I have done this? Because the way you entered crossed itself flagging an error in OSMInspector. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.45605&lat=-30.87017&zoom=6 Note the error will be gone with an update soon.

You must not use copyright data .....

No exceptions.

Navionics nautical chart - copy right!

Reversion is indicated!

You cannot use that data!
See osm.wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Queensland ... If it is green you can use it. But not otherwise.

I think this changeset may need to be reverted due to the source.

--------------------
The reason why the park boundary is details is because it comes from official sources.
The coastline is probably hand drawn from imagery - a tedious process leading to the rough nature of it.

I would think the reserve includes the lake, that would protect the lake.

Hi,
welcome to OSM.
You have not stated a source for this change. Maxar is usually the most upto date.

There are errors in Way: 747129881 - natural beach. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.02388&lat=-20.24235&zoom=16

Looking at the coast line here shows some plants being submerged, suggesting that the coastline is in error here.

Personally as the coastline is the hi tide mark I take the beach out to sea wards to show the extent of the sand - at least to where it fades out.

If you need help fixing this - leave a message.

relation/12893362 ... error.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.70898&lat=-37.57841&zoom=15

Also errors in two others... you are repeating the same errors over again. Learn and then correct these errors.

Hopefully the added detail might get a local interested, you never know.

Is it all 'managed'? Or some portion of it?

Darker green can also be a shadow from a ridge/hill.

Consider the map here is mostly blank. The addition of trees provides some little information.

Hi
Quote for OSM wiki "The natural key is used to describe wide variety of physical geography, geological and landcover features, including ones that have been modified or created by humans. "

I take natural=wood to be the presence of trees, not what they might be used for, or if they are 'natural' in some sense .

For 'use' then 'landuse' with forestry and/or forest and I'd include produce=timber/*. Note I would not map this purely from imagery, so 'on the ground knowledge' is required. Note that the land use would include the roads, buildings etc - where they contribute to the use of the land.

I'm mapping trees along the 'black cat track'.

Thanks. I find that 'river relation' a bit strange!
A stream is OSM defined as something you can jump/step over IIRC. I suppose <2m.

The relation is tagged as a 'river' yet a member way is tagged as a 'stream'.

So what is it? A river or a stream? It cannot be both.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.
I have deleted the building relation - made it into 2 separate buildings.
They are connected by a covered walkway .. best to add the tag covered=yes to these. And one further comment .. when a walkway enters a building there should be a node common to both the building and walkway .. with the tag entrance=yes/main/emergency

That one was fairly obvious - even to me. So a quick fix rather than discussion.

I came across it look at another error (node with name only).
Thanks for the explanation. Simply looking at the map without looking at the tags suggested the duplication.

Being lazy and liking simplicity I'd simply make a comment on the power line way that the 3 phases are carried on 2 lines on one pole with the remaining phase being carried on an (unmapped) adjacent single line with poles duplicated from the first lines poles.