Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 90322628 | Hi,
The name tag is not for a description of something, like 'Tennis' for a tennis court. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only |
|
| 99892719 | Hi,
These are the Princes Gardens Tennis Courts. Do you have an 'office'? |
|
| 104932352 | Hi,
|
|
| 104852400 | way/766468250 is NOT a cliff!!! |
|
| 104852472 | Sorry .. my comment here is in error... because your changeset comments are rubbish. |
|
| 104678928 | Hi,
|
|
| 104852472 | Hi,
|
|
| 104712400 | I use OSMInspector... mainly to find my own errors!
|
|
| 104712400 | HI... How to do buildings with parts. Make an outer way with building=* and the main tags. Then add each element as a new way with building:part=roof/*.
I think I have fixed this. |
|
| 104664162 | The relation for the section of hipped roof .. the tags go on the relation not on the outer way ..
|
|
| 86614584 | Hi,
I have reset this to name=Fairyland Pleasure Grounds, historic=park .. some ~200 uses. |
|
| 103944534 | 90 minutes later .. crude fixes done. |
|
| 103944534 | THE OUTER WAYS OF A RELATION SHOULD NOT HAVE THE SAME TAGS AS THE RELATION.
|
|
| 104347392 | Both are nodes, they don't show any extent. Where I have come across things I don't know the extent of I make a small area that can be seen as not the actual boundary (eg a circle) and put a note on it about the extent not being known. |
|
| 104345238 | Yes, I also added the surface tag. |
|
| 104279795 | I am removing some of you 'work' to restore data. Unfortunately this is only for one error.. there are a further 76 issues! I am inclined to delete more in order to restore the data. The simplest and quickest way for me is to revert your changesets. That will remove all of your entries. |
|
| 104213851 | I tend to make each of my change set comments different .. as they are usually .. well .. different. It is more work but when I look back I can find the one I'm looking for easier. |
|
| 104213851 | No source tag on Way: Bulloo River Walk (939568662) Much better to have the detail on the change set comment. |
|
| 91568407 | The tag 'source' stated that the source was the Qld Heritage Register. No other source was stated on the nodes (2 off). No comment nor source was given on the change sets. There was nothing to indicate any other source other than the Qld Heritage Register. If you want to avoid this occurring in future .. be careful with the source tag ... (source=name from Qld Heritage Register, location and feature from gps survey ?) and contact the software author for help with providing comments? |
|
| 104345238 | Hi
|