No need to have a relation for a simple way.
The parking area by it self would have no name, the name "Woodgrove Shopping Center" would be on the entire shopping center.

Arr I think I see what is going on... sigh. Relax... I'll just run in circles a bit more...

Hi,

Umm some of these lines are 'Up' not 'Down' ... they run to Central not away.

This is confusing me no end.

e.g Way: 147042409...

Multi level gets difficult. I don't think you'd be mapping floors inside the building just yet :)

Map the dog leg ground floor normally.

For the floors 2 and 3 map it as highway=footway, covered=yes, layer=1 (this puts it above the ground in OSM) and level=1 (this is 1st floor level=0 is the ground floor which is the default. This leaves out level=2 and at this stage I don't think that will worry anyone.
You can always ask the OSMwiki for guidance - see osm.wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging#Advanced_modelling_the_different_levels_.28floors.29 Note indoor mapping is very primitive at this stage.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

I have partial reverted this in order to restore some administration boundaries.
I have also modified the apron so that relation is now correct.

Please try to improve your changeset comments - see changeset/100406510#map=16/-33.9332/151.1790 for some idea.

Possibly try something simpler closer to home? Keep mapping.

relation/12384632 is not correct. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.10104&lat=-35.34505&zoom=18

Personally this looks like a walkway and might be better as highway=footway, covered=yes???

OK, I have updated the India Pacific train route so it is now correct.

Hi,

'operator=forests NSW' changed to 'Forestry Corporation of NSW'.

Except for Helipad - Kookaburra - looks to be NPWS now?

The Maxar imagery looks more upto date than bing.

Is this now in operation? Or are the old lines still being used?

Note: tags should be added for electrification - same as the connecting lines.

See
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.89581&lat=-32.00707&zoom=18

I see some ~ 17 errors ....

Hi,

way/907615451 (wood) has no area - it just forms a line. I have deleted this way.

The 'imagery used' should state the source for the information used in the changeset. OpenStreetMap (Standard) could not be the source for this change. Possibly Bing imagery ... or a personal survey or something else?

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

The DCS base map suggests that the park has a larger area and the boundary is slightly different from the river.

The park is not a boundary for the Hampton administration area, so I have removed it from there.

Forbes 'office' is a plant nursery .. and I've retagged it as such. Source: annual report FC of NSW + visual imagery shows nursery outside ..

Glens Creek is incorrect near the end - southern, the named creek goes further to the east rather than to the west.

Buccarumbi Creek - the source end ... there is no name on the base map for the end .. so that should not carry the name.

Both creeks are tagged 'intermittent' .. where did that information come from??? There is reasonable rainfall in this area .. I would expect them to have water most of the time.

When you changed Old Glen Innes Road you should remove or alter the source tag as 'survey' no loner applies to 'asphalt'

The "Forestry Corporation of NSW" is the correct name for the operator of State Forests in NSW.
The "Forestry Corporation" is a shortened version of the full name and could be confused with other states operators.

The easiest thing for me to do is delete it. You can then re-enter the parking area.

How should I 'close it'?????
Note the imagery does not show any car paring here at all so I have no guide.

Hi,

Muiltipolygons outer ways should not have the same tags on them as the relation.

I have fixed relation/12305019 (grass fairway).

Deleted.

Hi,
relation/12336738 (parking lot) is not closed. I cannot see it on imagery so cannot 'fix it'.
See relation/12336738#map=19/-33.61489/149.13792

I'd think it should be a simple closed way?