Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 95207108 | Hi, The multipoygon relation for the industrial building is not correct. The inside area should have a simple way .. with the role 'inner' fro the relation. Then the outside of the building should have a way, or a number of ways that form a continuous loop. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.84930&lat=-33.75930&zoom=17 However ... looking at it .. these are two separate buildings .. with 2 covered connections between them. I'd tag each building separately. Then add the walkways as separate 'buildings'. This would allow each to have different heights, colours etc. |
|
| 92950724 | Hi,
|
|
| 93780861 | The error for this relation continues to exist. |
|
| 92799358 | Hi,
|
|
| 95182723 | Hi, This changeset added areas to the relation of 'St Helena Village'. Where did you get the information that thesse areas are part of 'St Helena Village'? |
|
| 67114477 | Arr.. now it is clear. At the time I put that website link on the site was named "Crosslands Reserve" so I put the link on... later another mapper has changed the name ... but left the link on. I'll remove it. I'll also place the name and website on the camp ground a little way north ... + a few other details. |
|
| 67114477 | Hi,
Crossroads campground? Do you mean Crosslands? That is a reserve managed by the local council, not the national parks service. |
|
| 94490481 | Error. way/875071199 contains segment twice. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.90488&lat=-34.33832&zoom=17 |
|
| 93780861 | relation/11863794... fails.
Others look to be your work too? Pan that map south for more. |
|
| 93965560 | Hi,
If you want to identify a part of the building as different from the rest see building:part=* |
|
| 94464759 | Hi,
Side note The imagery used cannot be the DCS NSW Imagery as that does not show boundaries... |
|
| 93695260 | Error .. mine.
|
|
| 93695260 | Hi Arr.. no. Only one relation is required, not two. The relation should then have 2 members;
Next issue: way/867936796 has the same tags as the relation ... so the hole in the middle of the relation is pained over because the way says it is all water... remove the tags from the way and that will than leave the relation. ----------- Hope that makes some sort of sense. |
|
| 92547819 | See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.76701&lat=-37.77523&zoom=12 for some issues that should be fixed. |
|
| 93957306 | Hi, Multipolygon relations - thee other ways cannot share segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=139.27571&lat=-35.12366&zoom=18 In this case I would make a single outer way with the correct tags on it and delete the relation. |
|
| 92264606 | This does not need to be a multiploygon! KISS The simpler the objects in OSM the easier they are to understand for us humans and the easier they are to render for the computers. |
|
| 93323222 | Hi, Errors in relation/11815440 1) Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments! See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.45605&lat=-30.87017&zoom=6 2) building=yes;house ... no. It is either a house or not. Suggest separating the building or using building:part=*. |
|
| 93959294 | I would think there are some Casuarinas in the larger area at least. |
|
| 93818033 | Hi, Do these exist yet?
|
|
| 93623931 | Hi,
|