Hi,

The relation has 2 outer ways that share segments - this is a no no.

There are two entries for this one feature ... both 'Surface Hill Historic Reserve - one is a simple node... OSM says - one feature = one entry. ??? and the tags don't make much sense to me?

landuse forest - so used to get timber?
site_type mineral_extraction???
and
Historic Reserve... which matches the Parks Vic as the operator...
It may have been it the past forestry and/or mining. But tag what it is now.
So what is it now?

I'd delete the relation and leave the simple way.

Hi,

The multipolygon relation/11635213 is not good. The inner touches the outer .. that is a no no.

Better to delete the relation. Then create 3 simple ways for the 3 separate scrub areas.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments... And that is not the way to do building consisting of parts ... see
building:part=*

So ... make a simple way for the base of the building and tag that building=yes (or whatever) and then make simple ways for the different parts of the building tagged building:part=yes (or whatever). Note the details are on the wiki for levels/heights...

Hi,

Welcome to OSm...

There is a path inside a building ...???
See changeset/89779926#map=19/-31.97939/116.01751

Hi
The changes to the creek have broken 2administration boundaries... repaired.

Hi,

1) the state park
Multipolygons outers cannot share ways ... that is one outer way cannot overlay another outer way...

2) overlaps of state park with state forest?
As the state forest is now the state park? would it not be simpler to take the present relation of the state forest and make that the state park???

Hi,
the way/52349183 that you deleted is part of the relation for a retail area...
part reversion of this changeset to restore it.

Reverted.

Broke 4 admin boundaries.

Fence does not replace the land use for the church property, nor does the fence fully enclose the property - must be a gate some where....

Hi,
Further boundaries fixed... should be the end of them, at least as far as OSMinspector has at the moment.

I have also modified the tree areas so they stop at the murray river rather than the admin boundaries. This should make the murray river render as water only rather than the combination of both water and trees.

1) changeset comment does not relate to the change.
2) changeset source does not justify the change
3) 2 nodes related to the feature - only one is changed
4) there would be more that the 3 features at this location? Why are they not mapped?
5) details of feature are not mapped e.g. operating hours
6) past reputation of the mapper.

All the above leads to suspicion that the mapper has not reformed. Suggestion? Use mapillary to justify the changes.

Hi
Partial reversion to restore scrub area way/219762726. Looks to have no effect on admin boundaries?

Reverted.

Hi,

There is a self intersection of the relation for Port Sorell Conservation Area.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.55936&lat=-41.17342&zoom=17

HI,

Some of these are shared with park and administration boundaries (unfortunately). Be careful ...

In NSW I have (I think) removed, some of them at least, from these other boundaries. Good luck.

I have no idea what the changeset comment of Kioloa means. Arrr ... just an area... but what are you doing there?

There have been changes to the tree area relation that have broken it... Please make your changeset comments better? This helps me in repair any errors that may have been made.

Hi,

The relation for the residential area is not closed (as in not a closed area). To help in drawing these areas a look at the LIP Base Map is useful.

Some possible errors.. from the LPI base map...

The present track 'Hicks Road' (way/785502339) looks to be Ferndale Road at the western end. I don't see a 'Hicks Road' on the LPI base Map.

The present unclassified 'Ferndale Road' (way/785502338) looks to be a track and unnamed.

Hi,

The 'rubbish imported data' at least indicates that there is something here and about where it is. The alternative is a blank map with the notation 'there be dragons'.

In some decades the present gps data too could be regarded as 'rubbish'. We each contribute, adding and improving... please continue to contribute, but don't publicly degenerate others contributions no matter how you feel about it. Ok?

Hi,
Tracks and paths are ways .. not single nodes.

This 'pass' it self looks to be further west on the LPI Base Map... and on the imagery the present location looks to be a high point. I have used place=locality with name= * Pass for some of these where they are not in OSM terms 'mountain_pass'.

Hi,
What is the source of this information?

The NSW topo map has the peak further south and ele 723...