way/790661598 for a beach has 0 width.

Deleted.

Changes to ways 184393276 and 374898226 by this changeset have been reverted.

There will be further action to restore boundaries altered by you. Do not make further unwanted work - leave already entered boundaries in place and unaltered. If they are linked to some natural feature then separate the natural feature from them.

Note - the coastline is the high water mark, not the low water mark.

Way: 184393276 is NOT a natural feature but an administration boundary. Stop changing it to suit natural features.

Way: 374898226 is NOT a natural feature but a park boundary ... stop changing it to suit natural features .. leave the park boundary where it should be.

A path would normally connect to the road.

On Relation: 11039156 there is the tag reef=mud. But there is no tag natural=reef but rather natural=wetland. Which is it a wetland or a reef? There are similar conflicts on some of your other entries.

I think he reads them, so future changes may not have similar difficulties.

He never responds.

1) I do not understand the changeset comment "Amendments Requested by Osm". Link to this request?

2) "Sand at Low Tide" appears to be a DESCRIPTION!
I have removed this one and others.
Please do not add any more other than real names in the name tag. Descriptions should go in the description tag.

The map should show what you are trying to describe. Features such as buildings are not named 'building', nor tree areas as 'tree' .. the render can show these without overloading the resultant map with text describing things.

3) You should respond to these comments! You can do so here. This confirms you have revived the message and you may then enter any discussion you want.

This has harmed the French Island National Park boundary. This and your later changesets have made a bit of a mess of it. I'll have to come back to it.

Please don't change things that are already in OSM unless that is what you intend.

Hi,
Same comments on using the name tag for a description .. don't do it.

Hi,
Problem with way/790661598, a section of it has 0 width. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.30123&lat=-38.45372&zoom=16

The name tag should only be used for names, not descriptions. Please review 'Mud at Low Tide' and 'Sand at Low Tide' and possibly change the tag 'name' to 'description'.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

An issue with Way: 795123700
Tags:
"addr:suburb"="Ivanhoe East"
"addr:housenumber"="154"
"building"="house"

There are 2 building here and you have connected them in one way such that they cross over with no 'space'. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.05066&lat=-37.77388&zoom=18

It think the smaller of the two is a garage as a driveway leads to it, so it is not a house.

No 47 has the same problem. Looks like ther are a few of them...
Use https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.95697&lat=-26.63113&zoom=18 and pan around to spot them.
I'll leave them for you to fix, I'd just make them a simple way around the outside and not bother with the extra structure.

I would think they are all park of the park, maintained by the same operator etc. I see no reason to exclude them, but than I am not familiar with the area.

Just looks a little strange.
I added the cop shop and RFB.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

Muiltipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments. The relation for No 39 I have edited to remove that problem.

PS you may find Ersi imagery to be more upto date than bing, and Maxar possibly even better.

Hi,

Would not the parking areas, softball etc be part of the parklands? I realize that was not done by you , but you are more local than me.

Hi,

I don;t understand the name on a house of 'Possums Home". Can you explain?

Another relation - deleted.