This or one of your 2 previous edits looks to have broken relation/9198482.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.62591&lat=-36.09610&zoom=14

Bonds Rd ways 203043705, 203043704 and 203043702 look to be actually Josephine St.

What are you doing in this edit?

What is the source of this edit?

No changeset comments ..I don't know what you were trying to do ..

But you removed all but 1 way from the relation for the Tasman Sea!

Use changeset comments!!!!!!
See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

I am correcting the Tasman Sea entry.

You need to explain the rest of this changeset and start using changeset comments!

Humm.. Should be rendering by now?

Oh, I failed to delete the natural=2 values. Done.

And I have added the tag natural=coastline to the islands outerways.

See how that goes.

Hi,
Relation for Little Vanderlin Island (10118134, v1) draws errors..

First the 2 outers share segments.
Second the key natural should not have 2 values.

So I have remove the key natural from the island relation and made 2 new relations - one for sand the other for scrub.
I have corrected the island relation outer ways so they don't share segments.

Reverted.
Broken admin boundaries for Balmain and East Balmain.

No worries, fixed.

Comment ..
There is a lot of work to do in NZ.. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=175.34514&lat=-39.87126&zoom=7

By combining the coastline this has made the whole Island a National Park....

One section of the coastline is used by the National Park as its boundary...

Coast line is now in 4 sections. It may be broken to more sections e.g. for use as a beach boundary or other things.

So now the coastline is a relation.

Hi,
As relation/9712537 Ball's Pyramid has only one member so this can be a simple way. I have changed this.

So the tag 'construction=rail' should be removed?

OSM tagging does not include "highway=tree_row" ... it does have "natural=tree_row".

way/718244634 etc tagged as road with fixme .. I would assume these to be residential - same as the development to the north - Bradman Dr. etc.

way/674047783 tagged as highway=tree_row ...

Umm the way/673977783 is tag as natural=water and highway=tree_row ???? err what is it?

Hi,
Using the LPI Imagery I cannot see a railway nor a bridge on way/698616096. The bridge is there on Maxar, but no railway.

Not visible in Bing, Maxar nor LPI imagery.

You tagged construction=primary on way/235283592 ?? Is this under construction? It is also tagged highway=primary that suggests it is in use.

Many 'paddocks' are rather large .. and may not have 'fencing'. Think of the 'paddocks' in central Australia... However in this area I would expect there to be some fencing to stop stock wandering on to roads.
There may not be stock in a paddock due to stock rotation - to give the paddock a 'rest'.

Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments ..
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=135.54507&lat=-31.29734&zoom=12