I'd not take a simple sign stating the address as the name of the building.. I would add it as the address of that building. If I recall correctly all the 'names' I removed were not entered as the building addresses .. I did add the addresses. I did not remove 'names' that reflected addresses eg 'One on Never Street' These were left as they were .. but the address was added in the address field.
What got to me was recognising one of the building .. but not recalling its name. For the life of me I knew its name but could not recall it .. and it definitely was not the address that was entered as the name.

Hi,
An area of scrub .. is not necessarily a reserve. Way: 580315513 I have changed from nature_reserve to scrub .. that is all you can tell from imagery. The LPI Base Map would show a reserve - this particular bit is inside a park.
Well spotted on Simon Pearce Park though. :)

Keep the comments on the changeset - makes it easier for me to track.
Add way/604071145 affected 2 boundaries .. I have fixed them.
Adding way/604071144 affected 2 boundaries.. I have fixed them.

Note: in NSW, Australia you can use the NSW LPI Base Map to see where boundaries should be - the purple lines. This also has road names. The vast majority of road names have been done. Boundaries are another matter .. don't go changing the ones in there already, there have been some official changes to boundaries that may not be in the LPI data yet, but as a fix to broken boundaries they should suit. Only if you are local and know the present situation should you change the boundaries. I'd not add new boundaries either .. there are some locals doing that.

Hi,
the relation for Valla Reserve has a name .. but no physical presence .. like a park. And if the relation is a park then it would include the parking, picnic and building areas within the park. So it is really just a simple way.

And then the boundaries. Use the LIP Base Map for these .... much better than a survey as it has the legal boundaries.

I have deleted the relation and edited things in the area.

Hi,
Roundabouts don't go well on boundary relations. You need to remove them from the relation and make a new way - use the LPI Base Map to see where the boundary should go.

IIRC on the area checking .. something along the lines of crossed ways. Something like that.

Hi,
Not all of this park has grass. And the tags landuse_1 leisure_1 etc are better tagged as separate items .. not generally for all the park.
It would be nice to have a name for this park.

Similar comments for Lake Weeroona Park

Hi,
The tags you have added confuse things. I'd take the area as a park - that is its main function.
If you want to add drinking water ..then do that as a separate item .. preferably as a node where the water is. Playgrounds and picnic tables the same.
If you cannot be bothered but want to signify there presence in the park then add tags playground=yes, picnic_tables=yes, drinking_fountain=yes.

Hi,
The total area is not

bare rock
dirt

Nor is mountain a land use..

This area needs work!

The 'old school forest' .. is not all trees. And might be better named as Zion Hill?

There are 2 areas tagged Zion Field .. .are they all the same name?

Deleted.
Deleted Cowey Gang Path too.

They do not exist.

This 'Monde Park' .. it is not visible in Bing... does it exist?

And grass is a surface .. is the Park entirely grass?
A garden? Of grass?
A pitch? for what sport?

I don't think so. I have left it as a park for now, but removed the rest.

Oh .. if you want to look for your 'errors' only then http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=8&lat=-32.223&lon=117.262&item=xxxx&level=1&tags=&fixable=&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT and select 'issues by user' put in your details, check all the errors that it can list and then click on the permalink thing on the bottom right of the screen and bookmark it ...

Hi, I run OSMinspector .. usually first thing in the morning. As an area checker ..it picked up the building problem
Here you go https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.78174&lat=-32.55236&zoom=6

No worries. It is just that I had trouble with the reversion .. I usually go for a partial reversion so it keeps most of the changes... but this one did not want to do it. So I fully reverted then copied across to a new layer those bits that were to be fixe3d and then got the bits that the reversion there destroyed. I think it is ok .. but I'm not certain. Fingers crossed you don't find much.

Reverted. At least in part.
Destroyed 3 buildings, a parking aisle...

Check that what you wanted to add is still here.

Hi,
You have chosen to use the tag 'produce=wood'. I think this could be confusing .. with the tag 'natural=wood' already in frequent use. I think the tag 'produce=timber' may be better?
Thoughts?

Err fat finger here.. again?
Hi,
There are 2 'landuse=forest' here .. one with 'produce=wood' the other without.

The one without. I assume this is simply a group of trees .. why not tag them natural=wood?

The one with the tag 'produce=wood' I assume is productive .. but the word 'wood' I have trouble with .. I think 'produce=timber' is possibly better?

Hi,
There are 2 landuse=forest here .. one with produce=wood the other without.
The one without. I assue this is simply a grout of trees .. why not tag them natural=wood?

The one with the tag produce=wood I assume is productive .. but the word wood I have trouble with .. I thing produce=timber is possibly better?

Hi,
I too am questioning the Sugar Delete SF .. it does not appear in the Forestry Corporation list of SF... Is the cadid ref 169381348 verifiable .. and links to something?

Hi,
if you need help yell out on the Au talk group.
talk-au@openstreetmap.org .. you 'll need to subscribe. By locals who know the countryside.