No worries.
I had intended to do it myself ... but you were too quick for me! :)
These show up on osminspector as area problems, that is how I come across them.. mainly looking for my own errors.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.
For this park ... the park encompasses the footway so the park boundaries don't stop with the footway. If you look at the LPI Base Map you can see the legal boundaries for this park so you can get the boundaries right. I have made these changes. Take a look at it.
Keep mapping.

Hi,
Assume you are local to this area?
There needs to be a resolution between
Way: Betley Cycle Track (338425982) [which presently crosses itself] and the
Dunolly Havelock Cycle Trail (346449700) that looks to use parts of the Betley Cycle Track.

Deleted Way: 255733717. Poor duplication of Way: 255733720.
In this area the imagery that should be used is the LPI Imagery - better resolution and positional accuracy.

Hi,

There was a typo - highway=unclasified ... As I suffer from these too I took a look at them ... most are unclassified, but some are tracks or service. I use the LPI Base Map to determine the 'track, service' thing .. doted lines = track or service. Service is a short section leading to buildings.

I have corrected a number of these on several of your changesets .. looks like you have unclasified entrenched in your editor? Take care with that so as not to use the single 'S' version.

Hi
Removal of way/2765771 has damaged Relation: Daintree Close Park (6311578) .. unclosing it.
Suggest you reinstate way/2765771 and place it back into Relation: Daintree Close Park (6311578) with role outer.

Has broken relation/1601491.

Hi.
This changeset has caused problems with a beach area.
Also the source and attribution tags do not reflect the new source. Is this source better than the old source? And are you mapping the hi tide mark, low tide mark or some other water level?

Hi,
Movement of node/6504008 has resulted in crossing of way forming river bank. I have corrected this. Take care.

Hi
Moving node/3947680995 has caused the relation for the baths to cross... I have corrected this .. though probably not as it was intend. Take care....

Hi,
That is a fair time ago. Thanks for the comment!

2 issues.

First. The added tag of amenity=marketplace .. the OSM guide is one feature one OSM element .. as either this way is a foot path or a market place.. as it was originally tagged a footpath I'd use a separate OSM entry for the market place?

Second. Area .. implies the enclosed area is the thing tagged. As pedestrians cannot use the entire area this does not work well..

Those are my ideas .. can be entirely wrong! I would at least separate the two things though. That stops renders seeing it as a pedestrian area only.

Hi,
way/552423085 you have tagged as 'unclassified'. If you look on the LPI Base Map you can see it is of lesser class that the other roads .. so I take it as a 'track'. Further you can see it has no name, so I have changed it to highway=track and added noname=yes, source=LPI Base Map for track and noname, Bing for location. Note that the LPI imagery is better that Bing for both resolution and localization accuracy.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM. I agree that the playground is part of the park and should not be excluded, some mappers think they should be excluded for some reason...

But the outer way/141188773 was removed from the relation too. I have put it back, so the relation is now closed.

Hi,
I have deleted your added Way: Phoebe Court (510892796) that is a duplication of preexisting Way: Phoebe Court (30705255).

Your addition has more resolution, but no turning circle. You may also like y=to reference strava for location accuracy .. and reference something for the road name..

HI,

There are more than roads here. This has broken a relationship here for the suburb boundary of Evanston. Be carefull.

Hi,
Red Hill railway station (node/2522880885) - Is there actually anything left of this railway station left on the ground?

Is there actually anything left of this railway station left on the ground?

'It' being Argyle St?
This tagging is from Changeset: 13654452 by Ebenezer some 5 years ago.I did not notice it...
All 3 sat imagery show it as a market place with bollards top and bottom - the LPI is clearest.
Could it be tagged as residential with opening hours and pedestrian with the market opening hours?
https://www.therocks.com/things-to-do/the-rocks-markets.aspx does not mention Argyle st...

The few changes I have looked at have some justification. The problem I find is the conflict with previous mapping.
Perhaps a block?

Hi,
The relation for Red Cliffs Primary School (7910556, v1) shares segments of outer ways. That is not good. It is also tagged as a school and a park.. it cannot be both! OSM like the have one entry for one feature.

I have made the southern way the school and the northern way a park .. as that is what they look like from imagery. I have deleted the relation.