This has been deleted by some one..
possibly because it does not exist?
You will need to justify it better if it is real.

Has the WHOLE are changed from Industrial???

The park does not cross the road.
Further it does not encompass the house next door.
I have corrected this to LPI Base Map data ... take a look.

Deleted.

Area is not a park. Not shown in either LPI Imagery nor LPI base map.

Please do not enter fantasy. OSM is for actual objects.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

The 'Scott Park' entry looks more like 'Clareville Park' to me.. use the LPI Base Map to get the legal boundaries.
I have moved some of the boundary points ... away from the roads - they don't actually connect, there are foot paths in the way. There are more detailed points you can enter on this park boundary too ... from the LPI base map .. I'll leave it to you.

Talk to 'em. Otherwise you may get into edit wars.

Use landcover=grass ... landuse=grass may get changed. You can use both tags together just to avoid any migration issues with the landuse=grass tag.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Try using the LPI Base Map - that has cliffs on it - much easier to follow.

Not very polite to delete stuff without contacting the original mapper?

P.S.
On the Base Map there looks to be a footpath connected to your park that goes through to Kumali Close ... add it if it is there?

Hi, welcome to OSM. Some comments...

The footpath does not cross a waterway .. so should not carry the ford=yes tag.

The parks boundary can be better determined using LPI Base Map rather than the imagery.

There are some other green areas on the Base Map that may be of interest to you ... are they parks (leisure=park) or some kind of reserve (leisure=nature_reserve)? Take a look?

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

You have added node/4637970582 with the tags lesiure=park and name=Granby Park Sign ... This is not ideal in three ways;

The park is already entered as an area ... so there is no need to enter it again as leisure=park.

The name 'Granby Park Sign' I think says what the physical feature is ... a sign for Granby Park? Does it have any other information? If it contains information then you could tag it as tourism=information, information=sign. If it contains no information other than the parks name .. then I don't think it is a usefull map feature.

The name= tag should be for a real name ... not for the function of a feature.

Hi, welcome to OSM.

You have added the way/469421084 as highway=pedestrian .. this is used for wide areas of pedestrian spaces .. use highway=footway for normal width paths. Up to you to judge it.

It should be connected to the road - roads can be assumed to have pedestrian capabilities so the routeing of pedestrians can be done from the 'road' to your pedestrian way.

Hi, welcome to OSM.

The park (way/469412763) looks to be a house - 58 Oswald Street. Is it really a park now?

The footways you added should be integrated with the data that is already in OSM .. where they cross a road then should be connected using a node that is 'on' both the road and the footpath. Where the footpath uses a bridge (eg Macintyre River) that should be tagged... but in your case it is already there .. so you connect your footpath to the existing path on the existing bridge.

Hope that helps.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
You have added names to some of the paths you have added .. where did you get the names from? If these are your own 'names' ... then don't add them to the map, OSM should be used for 'official' or at least 'locally used' names. You can add the tag 'source' to say where these things came from, or add it in the comments section of your change set.
Enjoy.

Welcome to OSM.

As well as the LPI Imagery there is the LPI Base Map .. that gives you the boundaries for the park - you can use that base map data to make the park into an area .. it looks much better on the map.

You have removed the road 'Evans Street' totally from the map!

This is wrong.

If you want to add footpaths .. then add, don't change a valid object that is there and used to something else.

That took longer than I thought! Some deletions, many changes. I have taken some to be tourism=resort for example. Others I have expanded to be ways. Many have added website links. Anyway .. all reviewed now,

You have added a Way: 431386832 tagged landuse=forest .. I think you mean natural=wood. Generally landuse means the area is used for some human purpose, forest usually means it is logged. This area is not logged. I have altered it. The area is already covered by a larger natural=wood anyway so it won't show up.

One hand washes the other.
I need some clear time to do the rest of these. Possibly this afternoon.
As I said, I think I only checked them for duplication of tourism=attraction and not other things and that has lead to this problem. Still learning.