OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
150412897

Hi, Yes this was intentional, I think I also did the original edit. There is often steps on sidewalks so this was a wheelchair users path (low slope / access ramp). Did you changed other weird things on path / sidewalks ? (as much as you remembered, in Tahiti)

151385148

Hi birdlawyer, Sorry that I was a bit harsh on this comment, this was too many similar issues I reviewed and I got a little bit upset. I answered your colleague here (same topic), please don't hesitate to continue the discussion here then : changeset/150814189 Thks and happy mapping!

150814189

Hi, Thanks for your answer.
Just a quick info I never tried yet the strava heatmap so this is interesting. But still I didnt mean that this should be the reference, but should be taken into account rather. In some case it might be ok in others no.
So in this specific area I find (-3.73, -1.83) with esri clarified and (1.13, -3.39) with Bing. And if I use buildings it is (2.38, -1.68) with Bing and (-5.12, -2.96) with ESri clarified. I reckon the buildings are not clean in this area. So we still have a 3m diff. I would agree to take (1.13, -3.39) with Bing. Also I think generally Bing is more up to date than Esri. (i know because of some new buildings appear on Bing and not Esri). Would you agree?

150720934

Thks

151430398

Oh perfect, you are right, maybe the data got updated at a time, thks !

153269236

Yes this is perfect for me, thanks!Here is an other data source for roads : https://www.tefenua.data.gov.pf/datasets/dbe0c5c924e348bc8af063c98e42c7a0_8/ Both are interesting ... (one was a fork of the other and never get merged into one referential..)

150720934

hi rowcherry row, beware that we often have 2 roads very close and separated by a wall... this is normal :(
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150720934

150412897

Hi, could you please explain why you removed the footway here. It existed in my knowledge. Thks in advance

150369906

reverted because of need to prior align imagery : buidlings have a good precision accuracy when from French Polynesia data (and no other source than worldwide imagery cited)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150369906

153269236

(because name should be used with real item on site and not oral informations.. : but still i am ok with this approximation)

153269236

Hi, thk for the answer. I can tell you Route Ceinture is wrong, it should be Route de Ceinture. then Ouest and Est indicates chich side. Those are not official names but usual names. I am not sure we should have them on the name tag (but I am ok with it). For references with official sources you could check on tefenua.data.gov.pf

151430398

Hi thks for the answer. As the original data comes from an official source, I would have suggested to add a fixme or a note, so that we can check on site. I know that the roads can be very tight here. Also when checking with different imageries i am not sure, there is no connexion...

150814189

Hi PerpetualHiker. That would be very nice if you could replace piers and buildings where they were at the first place. It comes from quality data (french polynesia government). Thks for you understanding.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150814189

150814189

Hi PerpetualHiker, could you please replace the buildings and piers where they were at the first place? It comes from quality data (French polynesia government). Thks for you understanding.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150814189

151033361

please refer to other comments about aligning imagery first
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151033361

151033279

please refer to other comments about aligning imagery first
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151033279

151031315

please refer to other comments about aligning imagery first
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151031315

151069008

has been reverted (see comments on other changeset)
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151069008

151080167

reverted
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151080167

151115179

Hi, Imagery should be moved prior to changing building location. I corrected that.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151115179